Le 20 févr. 2015 à 11:22, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Thank you for keeping an eye on this.
Just a note: while the servers being down can induce some frustration we
should remember that INRIA is very kind to offer this support for our
community. So, thanks for all the hard work that happens
On 19/02/15 14:31, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
is restored… but I couldn’t applied the change I wanted… maybe tomorrow :)
On 19 Feb 2015, at 14:24, Yuriy Tymchuk yuriy.tymc...@me.com wrote:
Thank you Esteban.
On 19 Feb 2015, at 14:18, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:
is temporal
On 20 Feb 2015, at 12:21, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote:
On 19/02/15 14:31, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
is restored… but I couldn’t applied the change I wanted… maybe tomorrow :)
On 19 Feb 2015, at 14:24, Yuriy Tymchuk yuriy.tymc...@me.com wrote:
Thank you Esteban.
On 19
On 20/02/15 12:26, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
On 20 Feb 2015, at 12:21, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote:
In the last green build of the 3.0 SmalltalkHub image I cannot load your
changes. Some compiler bug.
I’m aware, fixing now.
A, good.
- ShTeamsHandlersearchTeamNamed: should
On 19 Feb 2015, at 10:19, Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de wrote:
Fogbugz issue 14936
and slice in inbox
After loading this slice, there are still many references to the (now)
obsolete class KMUntypeableSingleKeyCombination.
I tried to remove these references with the following code :
Hi,
CI Servers are still down.
Until they are up we can not do any integration nor run the automatic check
on submitted things.
Marcus
Thank you for keeping an eye on this.
Just a note: while the servers being down can induce some frustration we
should remember that INRIA is very kind to offer this support for our
community. So, thanks for all the hard work that happens behind the scene!
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at
However, reflecting all of this in the name, ComposableModel, makes it
unclear what it is for.
From Seamless Composition and Reuse of Customizable User Interfaces with
Spec ( http://rmod.lille.inria.fr/archives/papers/Ryse13a-SCICO-Spec.pdf )
UI Element: an interactive graphical element
On 20 Feb 2015, at 12:23 , Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de wrote:
2015-02-19 23:24 GMT+01:00 Johan Fabry jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl
mailto:jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl:
The problem is that people are confused by the term Model, so they will also
be confused by Logic. I want to remove the
Bueller?
I think the devs here are perhaps *slightly* more busy than the
drooling teenagers in that scene... :)
-C
--
Craig Latta
netjam.org
+31 6 2757 7177 (SMS ok)
+ 1 415 287 3547 (no SMS)
On 19/02/15 18:43, Damien Pollet wrote:
I think it would make sense to publish a configuration for
DeprecationFinder in the configuration browser. Does it work on any
Pharo image, or is it written on top of Moose ?
I'm trying to see if it still runs atm. Looking good in a
Moose 5.1. 50 MB of
Hi,
People are busy submitting fixes and improvements.. we should not forget to
give them feedback.
There are a lot if issues that needs reviews…
6 where the monkey ran (or can not run):
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/45/Review
and 26 waiting for the monkey that is down due to
instances ?
If you
open a fresh image and
change the setting to use the old workspace
open a workspace and execute:
GTPlayground allInstances size
- 1
There is already one instance. I tried to get rid of this instance but
I couldn't find a way.
I think this instance is responsible for issue
Hi,
The current Pharo4 contains *a lot* of MCVersionInfo instances.
MCVersionInfo allInstances size
11095
The hold on to strings, Date, UUID… a lot of stuff. All in all, this is around
10% of the current
image.
If you do
MCVersionInfo allInstances do: [ :each | each instVarNamed:
stepharo wrote
I was thinking that we could use Author
Ah, yes. That might be a good place. We have KeyChain in the image. I wonder
what the status of that is. It seems like it was designed for this
purpose...
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
As you know, I love cleaning ;)
But...
stepharo wrote
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-workingRoadmaps/blob/master/StringCleaning.md
What enlightenment am I supposed to gain from candidates for removal...
asLegalSelector, and later Done: candidates for removal...
asLegalSelector. I
Interesting!
I sometimes notice the phenomenon of image growing and I suspected it has
to do with the playground/inspector. We should investigate a memory leak
related to announcements. I will try to look into this.
Could you open an issue? This is a must fix for Pharo 4.
Cheers,
Doru
On
Damien
I decided that living is about mistakes so I will not stress and
continue to improve the platform.
And from time to time I will do a mistake and we will fix it.
I prefer to die because I have moved than because I feared to move
because at the end I will die.
Stef
Le 19/2/15 18:43,
Yes.
But convenience and clean separation of responsibilities sometimes conflict (I
mean, do all these object even have to know about files ?)
On 20 Feb 2015, at 23:42, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:
Now that we have a beautiful File API, would it make sense to use real file
Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
But convenience and clean separation of responsibilities sometimes
conflict (I mean, do all these object even have to know about files ?)
Good point! But what do we do? The logic is too complicated for users to
roll-their-own... It would be nice to have a
On Feb 20, 2015, at 12:07, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:
Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote
If the goal is avoiding confusion to data model classes...
Do we even need Composable in the name? This is relevant from a where we
came from standpoint, but to a new user, maybe it can
Chris, didn't you do something about this in Squeak? It would be nice to keep
consistent if possible...
Eliot (phone)
On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:41 AM, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi,
The current Pharo4 contains *a lot* of MCVersionInfo instances.
MCVersionInfo allInstances
Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote
If the goal is avoiding confusion to data model classes...
Do we even need Composable in the name? This is relevant from a where we
came from standpoint, but to a new user, maybe it can be documented without
adding 10 characters to the class name...
-
Cheers,
Do we even need Composable in the name?
Why not just SpecModel or SpecUIModel?
Btw there's also DynamicComposableModel.
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de wrote:
2015-02-08 13:01 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com:
Hi Nicolai,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de wrote:
14850 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?14850 Integrate
ccrraaiigg wrote
Bueller?
I think the devs here are perhaps *slightly* more busy than the
drooling teenagers in that scene... :)
Hopefully, our days with Smalltalk are more like borrowing the Ferrari for
an adventure ;)
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
Hello,
The issue tracker has an ever growing list of issues. We do a lot (e.g. last 7
days we closed 55),
but nevertheless, as some point this is so much that issues are just not being
acted on because
there are so many.
Therefore:
- Please check *ALL* the issue that you submitted.
Have they
2015-02-08 13:01 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com:
Hi Nicolai,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de wrote:
14850 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?14850 Integrate GTools
#development
From this version onwards the development version should be
Le 20/02/2015 15:41, Marcus Denker a écrit :
Hi,
The current Pharo4 contains *a lot* of MCVersionInfo instances.
MCVersionInfo allInstances size
11095
The hold on to strings, Date, UUID… a lot of stuff. All in all, this is around
10% of the current
image.
If you do
MCVersionInfo
Chris, didn't you do something about this in Squeak? It would be nice to
keep consistent if possible...
Yes, but no one liked it because it employed the Proxy design-pattern
and requires a become. Perhaps if I'd gotten it perfect the first
time it'd have been better-received. But, I
30 matches
Mail list logo
