2015-10-08 23:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda :
> Hi Nicolai,
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Nicolai Hess wrote:
>
>> Hello Eliot, and thanks for your time.
>>
>>
>> In our (pharo) implementation for sourceNodeForPC, we start at the
>> AST-Node of
>>
On 10-10-15 20:41, stepharo wrote:
Hi stefan
could you open a bug entry and publish a merge?
We participated to an hackaton with esteban, pablo, kevin and cyril and we
are not really happy about the tools, the frameworks...
:(
I can fix those. How do I check for (partially?) missing source
Projects that load packages using Metacello, tend not to look in Pharo50
and Pharo50Inbox for new versions of those packages.
I noticed the Rubric version in Moose 6 to be significantly behind the
one in Pharo 5... Can we automatically copy back the inbox/integrator
version to its repo?
Christophe,
I still don't have a lot of time to read the paper and try to understand
what you are trying to accomplish, but I am curious how you think
"package dependencies" will play with git-based projects?
In git-based repositories I don't think you have the same type of
dependency
do we have a document to show how to do such reboot?
Le 7/10/15 16:55, Marcus Denker a écrit :
On 07 Oct 2015, at 15:47, Blondeau Vincent
> wrote:
Hi,
It is very hard to work because Smalltalkhub is very instable
On 10-10-15 10:28, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
RubFloatingEditorBuilder>>whenReturnEntered: anAnnouncement
RubFloatingEditorBuilder class>>exampleCommandLauncher
RubFloatingEditorBuilder class>>exampleEditableStringMorph
In Inbox theer are two 285s, and changes from Alain were not merged
I do not remember the causes under first question. Something was broken and
some layouts were not working. I’ve made a heavy usage of classes that align
all elements alone some pane, and they were removed from RoassalWoden, so I
have to add them as my own classes. Also I’ve added a lot of
Yes, I would like to understand why you cannot migrate to woden
Alexandre
> Le 10 oct. 2015 à 04:55, stepharo a écrit :
>
>
>
> Le 9/10/15 19:59, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
>> 2 reasons:
>>
>> 1) something is always incompatible (I’ve tried 2 times already)
>> 2) I have too