Re: [Pharo-dev] gtInspector+FastTable enhancement requests

On 10 December 2017 at 16:51, Ben Coman wrote: > Feedback for GT'ers... > > I'm probably ab-using FastTable support in gtInspector, > but as a quick hack during initial prototyping it was *very* nice > to be able review retrieved data as a table of instances > with a column

Re: [Pharo-dev] [IMPORTANT] PHARO CONTRIBUTION PROCESS UPDATED! PLEASE READ!

On 14 December 2017 at 20:19, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi! > > I’m working on simplifying the contribution process, after collecting > opinions/experiences last couple of months. > As you know, Pharo contribution process is still WIP and we aim to have it > as smooth as

Re: [Pharo-dev] New Year Wishlist (2018) ?

On 24 December 2017 at 00:58, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi everybody, > > This looks like a good moment of the year to ask all of you what would you > want to see in Pharo next year. > Features, improvements, radical changes, etc…. whatever you want. > > Of course, this

[Pharo-dev] Soup Bug? Pre Tags Should Be Nestable

I did some research and don't see any restriction on nested pre tags, yet Soup includes in "NonNestableBlockTagsForHtml". This causes the following to be parsed as two sibling tags: Hi there This act shall take effect immediately. Moving from NonNestableBlockTagsForHtml to

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #408: 20916 Use category "utilities" instead of "utils" in Kernel classes

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #408 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #640 was integrated: "20916 Use category "utilities" instead of "utils" in Kernel classes" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/640 Issue Url:

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #407: 20920 RPackageOrganizer should use packageClass instead of RPackage references

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #407 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #648 was integrated: "20920 RPackageOrganizer should use packageClass instead of RPackage references" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/648 Issue Url:

Re: [Pharo-dev] How to restore image upgrade? was New Year Wishlist (2018) ?

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Nicolas Cellier < nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2017-12-25 23:54 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman : > >> As a half-way house, consider that "upgrade" scripts could be a good >> mechanism >> post-Release when changes should be

Re: [Pharo-dev] Replacement for deprected MultiByteFileStream?

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Henrik Sperre Johansen < henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no> wrote: > Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote > > Hi Bernhard > > > > Have a look at how guille started to implement File package. > > (Guille is actively converting all the image users of the old > > hierarchy but last

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg merged pull requests?

> On 3 Jan 2018, at 23:09, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > > You should double click on the pharo lines and looks in the update > pane you will see the updates (but you should pull from pharo to sync > your repo). > > Stef > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Bernhard