What I do not like is that people say " group but they keep kicking me out of
their mailing list ” when this is absolutely not true!
We can discuss and can argue even violently but we do not lie.
S.
> On 31 May 2020, at 19:38, Bruce O'Neel wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> So addressing only the
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 6:18 AM Norbert Hartl wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> thanks for the info but I won't read it. I try to focus on things that
> matter. There are too many things that try to distract everyone from
> producing something helpful. Law suits are IMHO not of that kind.
>
> I would rather
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #327 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #6400 was integrated: "Image side changes to use the new
memory accessor primitives."
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6400
Issue Url:
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #326 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #6432 was integrated: "[fix] remove usage of reflectivity to
get ast methods by default."
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6432
Issue Url:
Hi Paul,
thanks for the info but I won't read it. I try to focus on things that matter.
There are too many things that try to distract everyone from producing
something helpful. Law suits are IMHO not of that kind.
I would rather put some money on the table for someone building proper FFI to
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #325 was: SUCCESS.
The Pull Request #6461 was integrated:
"6412-RBComment-should-have-parent-pointer-to-node"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6461
Issue Url:
