[Pharo-dev] Re: Abut writeOn: versus storeOn:

I have the impression that it is a left over of the dataStream and that we can remove it. S > On 19 Dec 2020, at 22:02, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > Hi > > I saw that a couple of collections implement writeOn: in addition to storeOn: > and I was wondering if someone knows > the reason. My gu

[Pharo-dev] Abut writeOn: versus storeOn:

Hi I saw that a couple of collections implement writeOn: in addition to storeOn: and I was wondering if someone knows the reason. My gut feeling is that this is somehow dead code. Because readOn: logic is the inverse of storeOn: and I was wondering what is the equivalent for writeOn: S -