Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] About balkanisation

2016-11-07 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
> On 7 Nov 2016, at 11:28, Dale Henrichs > wrote: > > > > On 11/7/16 4:52 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> btw this is pharo-dev discussion, redirecting there. >> >> Esteban >> >>> On 7 Nov 2016, at 08:50, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>> >>> We are developing Iceberg… and I know is not enough

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] About balkanisation

2016-11-06 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
btw this is pharo-dev discussion, redirecting there. Esteban > On 7 Nov 2016, at 08:50, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > We are developing Iceberg… and I know is not enough :) > Which “unifying tools” are you referring ? > > I have followed very close your TOdE development… in a moment I was plann

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] About balkanisation

2016-11-06 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi Stef, I think that you are raising a valid point, and I actually agree with it. But I think there is another side of the coin as well. I think that right now we are in between worlds and this is not quite beneficial. Switching to GitHub is a significant effort, and treating it as business a

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] About balkanisation

2016-11-06 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
> It may look super cool and be hyper trendy to use github (because like > that you can say that you use latest hyper cool > > features), but I would like to ask especially people building libraries > to pay attention that it is important > > that other people can contribute back easily and that th