Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30324

2013-08-06 Thread Benjamin
That's the default comment when the method is generated by Nautilus Ben On Aug 6, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > I don't understand all those > UsersManager>>initialize > + "Initialization code for UsersManager" > > isn't that pretty obvious that the initialize method contains

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30324

2013-08-06 Thread Sebastian Tleye
Hi Guille, It is a merging problem, this issue was made using changesets, and it seems that someone modified the method after the changesets were created. Doing the integration now, the method went back to its original code. I'll take a look at the changes for possible bugs. 2013/8/6 Guillermo P

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30324

2013-08-06 Thread Guillermo Polito
I don't understand all those UsersManager>>initialize + "Initialization code for UsersManager" isn't that pretty obvious that the initialize method contains the initialization code? :POr are they autogenerated or something? sorry for the silly question :) Guille On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:46

[Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30324

2013-08-06 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
30324 - 11200 Repeated methods in superclasses, explicit requirement no implemented, repeated methods in traits https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11200 (pass 2... fiuuu :P) Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Traits-EstebanLorenzano.554.diff http://sm