Re: [Pharo-dev] Annotating classes

2013-09-16 Thread kilon
yeah I think option b is better cause it does not corrupt existing code. This way I wont have to modify existing classes to add those tags. I could even tag group of classes or group of methods ( or protocols ). Igor Stasenko wrote there's only two practical ways (which i know and use) of

Re: [Pharo-dev] Annotating classes

2013-09-13 Thread kilon
I like to hear some more details on this and other opinions too. One of the thing I want to work is a new SystemBrowser with more flexible browsing system. I take inspiration from preset browsers in software sysnthesizers. Each preset represent a sound that can be manipulated with real time

[Pharo-dev] Annotating classes

2013-09-12 Thread Torsten Bergmann
We can mark methods with pragmas and ask the pragma collector to give the methods marked with it. Do we (already) have some kind of pragma like mechanism to annotate classes? I mean a general mechanism that one can use to mark classes with pragmas/settings/ ...? There are various scenarios

Re: [Pharo-dev] Annotating classes

2013-09-12 Thread Igor Stasenko
On 12 September 2013 13:56, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote: We can mark methods with pragmas and ask the pragma collector to give the methods marked with it. Do we (already) have some kind of pragma like mechanism to annotate classes? I mean a general mechanism that one can use to

Re: [Pharo-dev] Annotating classes

2013-09-12 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
Isn't answering to a message not enough? Like #nbStruc #ormTableName etc. Pragmas are somehow orthogonal to the common message sending and method lookup. Esteban A. Maringolo 2013/9/12 Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com On 12 September 2013 13:56, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote: