Re: [Pharo-dev] CodeImporter and Rubric will not be external projects managed by configurations

2016-06-15 Thread Yuriy Tymchuk
> On 11 Jun 2016, at 10:46, stepharo wrote: > > Cargo all the packages have a configuration Would work the same as having only one package per repo :)

Re: [Pharo-dev] CodeImporter and Rubric will not be external projects managed by configurations

2016-06-11 Thread stepharo
Cargo all the packages have a configuration and it should be easier. even if projects will have to specify their hosts. BTW I hope that we will kill rubric because alain did it just as a hack to help synectique. Yes, good idea, external projects only make sense if they really can exist

Re: [Pharo-dev] CodeImporter and Rubric will not be external projects managed by configurations

2016-06-10 Thread Nicolai Hess
I don't much about code importer, but +1 for rubric 2016-06-10 10:50 GMT+02:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe : > Yes, good idea, external projects only make sense if they really can exist > outside Pharo and if they are actively maintained as such. > > > On 10 Jun 2016, at 10:43, Pavel

Re: [Pharo-dev] CodeImporter and Rubric will not be external projects managed by configurations

2016-06-10 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Yes, good idea, external projects only make sense if they really can exist outside Pharo and if they are actively maintained as such. > On 10 Jun 2016, at 10:43, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > > Hi, > > to make our and your lifes easier we want to stop to manage

[Pharo-dev] CodeImporter and Rubric will not be external projects managed by configurations

2016-06-10 Thread Pavel Krivanek
Hi, to make our and your lifes easier we want to stop to manage CodeImporter and Rubric as external projects. For CodeImporter it makes no sense to have it as external project and moreover why to have special configuration for only one package. The Rubric has a lot of small updates, not defined