Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea: User-Installed Nautilus Package Group

2016-09-04 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
EstebanLM wrote > +1 I will not open an issue because I don't have time to work on it right now and suspect it will languish and be closed (not complaining), so I will add it way down on my personal todo list and I leave opening an issue to anyone actually willing to do the work. - Cheers,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea: User-Installed Nautilus Package Group

2016-09-03 Thread stepharo
There was a smart group with all recent packages and nobody used them. So if you want to add a group with the functionality you need go ahead. What we could do is mark all the present packages only display a diff after loading. I would like to have a different group behavior such as

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea: User-Installed Nautilus Package Group

2016-09-03 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
> On 3 Sep 2016, at 17:06, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > I've often wanted to know which packages I had personally installed in an > image (i.e. non-kernel). Our one-level-deep package nesting makes the full > list unnavigable, so how about a Nautlius group where all new

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea: User-Installed Nautilus Package Group

2016-09-03 Thread Thierry Goubier
Le 03/09/2016 à 17:06, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : I've often wanted to know which packages I had personally installed in an image (i.e. non-kernel). Our one-level-deep package nesting makes the full list unnavigable, so how about a Nautlius group where all new packages get included

[Pharo-dev] Idea: User-Installed Nautilus Package Group

2016-09-03 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
I've often wanted to know which packages I had personally installed in an image (i.e. non-kernel). Our one-level-deep package nesting makes the full list unnavigable, so how about a Nautlius group where all new packages get included automatically? We could clear it out prior to release et voila!