> On 2 Nov 2016, at 07:37, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
>
> Impressive , Cuis has 13 times less classes than Pharo. Maybe I should give
> it a closer look afterall.
Cuis is quite nice, impressive even. Ideal for learning and then some.
But don't be fooled: it lacks lots and lots of things that yo
Impressive , Cuis has 13 times less classes than Pharo. Maybe I should give
it a closer look afterall.
Pity that does not translate well in hard disk space. Pharo 6 is 100mbs
Cuis is just 70mbs. The VM alone is 50 mbs.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:38 AM p...@highoctane.be
wrote:
> Setting the Playg
Setting the Playground contents, yeah, I see what you mean. The old
Workspace worked better there.
I disagree with your view on the modularity.
And Cuis is nice indeed (and the UI is fast) -
https://github.com/Cuis-Smalltalk-Learning/Learning-Cuis shows the number
of classes. Definitely less than
> On 1 Nov 2016, at 21:21, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
>
> I was trying just yesterday to do something super simple, change the contents
> of Playground via code. I used the inspector to navigate , I ended up running
> around and accomplish zero.
Why not go the Spec way ?
window := TextModel n
I was trying just yesterday to do something super simple, change the
contents of Playground via code. I used the inspector to navigate , I ended
up running around and accomplish zero.
Bootstraping will never make Pharo easy. Bootstraping is for making it
smaller and more modular. Completely diffe
Bootstrapping is needed to escape the big ball of mud that the current
image is.
It is already much much much better than Pharo 1x.
Having a smaller core can iron out a lot of issues and make it super stable.
And decouple the various parts. That is no small feat indeed.
And frankly it is super hard
We already have a ton of ready made image in CI that pharolauncher has
access to and it is very easy to build your own. I build my own images
regularly with a makefile and startup script. You can do a lot of neat
tricks with those two combinations.
Because my image grows quite large lately I was t
Le 29/10/16 à 08:39, p...@highoctane.be a écrit :
Having them in image can indeed be useful.
I am testing against REST backends, and well, this is a destructive
test to say the least. Not easy to replay as much as I want.
I hope that with the Bootstrap we'll be able to have a set of
"Batte
Having them in image can indeed be useful.
I am testing against REST backends, and well, this is a destructive test to
say the least. Not easy to replay as much as I want.
I hope that with the Bootstrap we'll be able to have a set of "Batteries
Included" distributions. Kind of like we have Moose
