Re: [Pharo-dev] New Iceberg Version 1.2.1

2018-08-09 Thread Guillermo Polito
> > [SNIP] > I think I can see what is the rationale behind it but I’m not sure this > can be the way to go: > > - I don’t think there can be a „standard way“ of defining source > directory. And I don’t think that a tool should enforce this however. I > keep frontend and backend code in some

Re: [Pharo-dev] New Iceberg Version 1.2.1

2018-08-08 Thread Damien Pollet
First of all, quick stupid question: I'm currently loading my code with gitlocal://./src as the repository URL (my workflow starts in a terminal rather than in a Pharo image) Should I just remove the /src part, now that my repo has the project metadata? Also, are more features planned for the

Re: [Pharo-dev] New Iceberg Version 1.2.1

2018-08-08 Thread Norbert Hartl
> Am 07.08.2018 um 16:00 schrieb Guillermo Polito : > > Hi, > > I'll write down some of the reasons of the project's design, like that I can > afterwards copy paste it in the wiki :). > > First, this design did not came up from an egg. We worked on it for about two > months. And it is

Re: [Pharo-dev] New Iceberg Version 1.2.1

2018-08-07 Thread teso...@gmail.com
Only adding a small detail, the Metacello expression is used to generate the project that is offered. Also I see it as the Detached head status for projects that are loaded using Metacello. Maybe we should display the dirtiness in other way, but I think that is not a problem. It is normal that a

Re: [Pharo-dev] New Iceberg Version 1.2.1

2018-08-07 Thread Guillermo Polito
Hi, I'll write down some of the reasons of the project's design, like that I can afterwards copy paste it in the wiki :). First, this design did not came up from an egg. We worked on it for about two months. And it is thought to be backwards compatible and manage lots of metacello

Re: [Pharo-dev] New Iceberg Version 1.2.1

2018-08-07 Thread Norbert Hartl
Forgot one thing. I find the new project feature quite intrusive. It will add those file to all repos unasked. So I have a lot of dirty projects I have no write access to. How is this supposed to work. Isn’t it better to assume defaults and add an option to add project files? Norbert > Am

Re: [Pharo-dev] New Iceberg Version 1.2.1

2018-08-07 Thread Norbert Hartl
Great, thanks! I used 1.2.0 a few days ago and I had some problems: - some repos like voyage had a .properties file in the repo with content „{}“. This made the repo unusable. The only thing noticed is that in the repo view in iceberg the packages were named Voyage-Core.package instead of

[Pharo-dev] New Iceberg Version 1.2.1

2018-08-07 Thread teso...@gmail.com
New Iceberg Version 1.2.1 [ https://github.com/pharo-vcs/iceberg/releases/tag/v1.2.0 + https://github.com/pharo-vcs/iceberg/releases/tag/v1.2.1] Thanks to all brave users, issue reporters, and contributors :). This version includes the implementation of projects. Projects are a way of defining