Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-07-28 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
hah… wait a bit… I will integrate it… > On 28 Jul 2016, at 16:10, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Sean P. DeNigris wrote >> Bump :) >> [waiting patiently while all my build scripts are broken in Pharo 5.0] > > So close! Marked "Fix to include". Who can integrate it?! > >

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-07-28 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Sean P. DeNigris wrote > Bump :) > [waiting patiently while all my build scripts are broken in Pharo 5.0] So close! Marked "Fix to include". Who can integrate it?! - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-5-0-Tiny-Feature-Request-tp4901682p4908459.html

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-07-26 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Sean P. DeNigris wrote > Reviewed by the monkey. Please integrate at your earliest convenience :) > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18757/Simple-Shell-Command-Eval-for-5-0 Bump :) [waiting patiently while all my build scripts are broken in Pharo 5.0] - Cheers, Sean -- View this message

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-07-19 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Sean P. DeNigris wrote > Great. Done. Slice in inbox: > SLICE-Issue-18757-Simple-Shell-Command-Eval-for-50-SeanDeNigris.1 Reviewed by the monkey. Please integrate at your earliest convenience :) https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18757/Simple-Shell-Command-Eval-for-5-0 - Cheers, Sean --

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-07-16 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
EstebanLM wrote > just submit an SLICE, for now… I will sync the repository. Great. Done. Slice in inbox: SLICE-Issue-18757-Simple-Shell-Command-Eval-for-50-SeanDeNigris.1 - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-07-16 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
Hi Sean, just submit an SLICE, for now… I will sync the repository. Esteban > On 16 Jul 2016, at 04:42, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Sean P. DeNigris wrote >> But I'm not sure how to commit it. It changes UFFI which has a >> configuration. What do I commit (package,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-07-15 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Sean P. DeNigris wrote > But I'm not sure how to commit it. It changes UFFI which has a > configuration. What do I commit (package, slice, config(s))? And to where > (UFFI repo, inbox)? Bump :) How is it possible that there's not a simple answer to how to commit a small fix to core?! -

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-07-12 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
stepharo wrote > open a bug entry. Done: 18757 Simple Shell Command Eval for 5.0 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18757/Simple-Shell-Command-Eval-for-5-0 But I'm not sure how to commit it. It changes UFFI which has a configuration. What do I commit (package, slice, config(s))? And to where

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-06-19 Thread Peter Uhnak
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:05:45AM +0200, Max Leske wrote: > > > On 19 Jun 2016, at 01:44, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > > > Max Leske wrote > >> Why don’t you use OSSubprocess? > > > > My scripts require this functionality to be pre-loaded in a vanilla image. > > Ok,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-06-19 Thread stepharo
open a bug entry. Stef Le 19/6/16 à 01:44, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : Max Leske wrote Why don’t you use OSSubprocess? My scripts require this functionality to be pre-loaded in a vanilla image. Also, on a minor note, some projects use OSProcess and I thought OSSP and OSP are incompatible.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-06-19 Thread Max Leske
> On 19 Jun 2016, at 01:44, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Max Leske wrote >> Why don’t you use OSSubprocess? > > My scripts require this functionality to be pre-loaded in a vanilla image. Ok, just wanted to check. > Also, on a minor note, some projects use OSProcess and

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-06-18 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Max Leske wrote > Why don’t you use OSSubprocess? My scripts require this functionality to be pre-loaded in a vanilla image. Also, on a minor note, some projects use OSProcess and I thought OSSP and OSP are incompatible. - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-06-18 Thread Max Leske
Why don’t you use OSSubprocess? Cheers, Max > On 18 Jun 2016, at 16:24, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > I know our policy is to only backport severe bug fixes, but I have one method > I'd like added to 5.0 which would make my life a lot easier. Since > NBMacShell has been

[Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-06-18 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
I know our policy is to only backport severe bug fixes, but I have one method I'd like added to 5.0 which would make my life a lot easier. Since NBMacShell has been removed, there doesn't seem to be a built-in way to send simple shell commands, which has broken all my project/image load scripts. I