[Pharo-dev] Putting load on smalltalkhub

2013-09-18 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Around 12.00 we managed to load and analyze upto 100 mczs/minute from Smalltalkhub. We hoped that we would not be able to overload Smalltalkhub from a home ADSL connection, using a single (non multi-threaded) Moose image. However, this seems to coincide with some failing jenkins builds. We

Re: [Pharo-dev] Putting load on smalltalkhub

2013-09-18 Thread Igor Stasenko
On 18 September 2013 13:18, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote: Around 12.00 we managed to load and analyze upto 100 mczs/minute from Smalltalkhub. We hoped that we would not be able to overload Smalltalkhub from a home ADSL connection, using a single (non multi-threaded) Moose image.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Putting load on smalltalkhub

2013-09-18 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Igor wrote: i think you should contact Nico about how to run tests using some test server first, and only if it passes, on deployed one :) Oh, the code was working fine ;) Really no different to copying monticello packages from one repo to another. It's just that I try to find all invocations in

Re: [Pharo-dev] Putting load on smalltalkhub

2013-09-18 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 18 Sep 2013, at 17:19, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 September 2013 13:18, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote: Around 12.00 we managed to load and analyze upto 100 mczs/minute from Smalltalkhub. We hoped that we would not be able to overload Smalltalkhub from

Re: [Pharo-dev] Putting load on smalltalkhub

2013-09-18 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Sven wrote StHub is an important shared community resource. Definitely. And this is a stop-the-line problem. Having a single image on an ADSL connection bring down smalltalkhub doing one mcz request at a time means there is a serious dos risk. This is my packagecache from the offending run: