But is there an issue or not? Because I was not able to find it. If there is no
issue I will create one.
Cheers.
Uko
> On 21 Nov 2015, at 12:15, stepharo wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 20/11/15 15:01, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> is it a known issue that if you are
2015-11-23 9:01 GMT+01:00 Yuriy Tymchuk :
> But is there an issue or not? Because I was not able to find it. If there
> is no issue I will create one.
>
please create one. There are two other issues about RB and Traits but they
don't match this issue - I think
>
> Cheers.
Le 20/11/15 15:01, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
Hi guys,
is it a known issue that if you are refactoring something (eg. doing a class
rename) and some changes should happen in a method which comes from trait, then
new methods are compiled in concrete classes instead of changing the trait
Not sure about current Pharo, but I know that it has been a problem in the past
(e.g. in 1.3 you should *never* use refactoring when a trait is affected).
> On 20 Nov 2015, at 15:01, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> is it a known issue that if you are refactoring
Hi guys,
is it a known issue that if you are refactoring something (eg. doing a class
rename) and some changes should happen in a method which comes from trait, then
new methods are compiled in concrete classes instead of changing the trait
method?
Cheers.
Uko
Definitely had this (new methods are compiled in concrete classes instead of
changing the trait method) several times, although I'm not sure if it was
after refactoring, or something else (loading packages?).
--
View this message in context: