Re: [Pharo-dev] What is the current status of flow (flow-stack)?

2016-01-08 Thread Erik Stel
Hi Sebastian, Thanks for the update. I'm starting with a new project and need to get the requirements clear before deciding which tools will help me (and make me happy) most. I'll also continu using Meteor, but I prefer Smalltalk over Javascript/Coffeescript ;-). Currently I don't see Amber as

Re: [Pharo-dev] What is the current status of flow (flow-stack)?

2016-01-08 Thread Craig Latta
Hoi Erik-- > SqueakJS seems a 'heavy' solution since I probably would like to keep > the front-end relatively thin (and not use the Morphic UI). You can also use the MVC UI, or use no Smalltalk graphics at all and just manipulate the DOM etc. via the JavaScript bridge. -C -- Craig Latta

[Pharo-dev] What is the current status of flow (flow-stack)?

2016-01-06 Thread Erik Stel
Hi, What is the status of flow? Having worked on a Meteor project I got the idea this would be nice to have such a platform/stack in Pharo/Amber combo (back-end/front-end). Searched the web and found https://github.com/flow-stack/flow . No updates for

Re: [Pharo-dev] What is the current status of flow (flow-stack)?

2016-01-06 Thread sebast...@flowingconcept.com
Hi Erik, 2015 was a Smalltalk-sabbatical year for me Erik, that's one of the reasons why as you see in the github commits, development has not moved further. But to be honest there is more, the direction of Amber doesn't look too exciting to me because in the end, the frontend productivity output