Re: [Pharo-dev] git and author/timestamps, 10000's of files, etc.

> On 15 Jan 2018, at 11:13, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 15 Jan 2018, at 10:44, Guillermo Polito wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Dale Henrichs >> wrote: >> I've been

Re: [Pharo-dev] git and author/timestamps, 10000's of files, etc.

Hi, > On 15 Jan 2018, at 10:44, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Dale Henrichs > > > wrote: > I've been skimming the ironically named "blame" thread and just

Re: [Pharo-dev] git and author/timestamps, 10000's of files, etc.

On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Dale Henrichs < dale.henri...@gemtalksystems.com> wrote: > I've been skimming the ironically named "blame" thread and just want to > clear up some apparent misconceptions. > > git/github is not the reason that the author/timestamps information was > "lost" ...

Re: [Pharo-dev] git and author/timestamps, 10000's of files, etc.

Hi Dale, What is the atomic change considered? Method level or line level? In the first case, author and timestamps won't conflict unless the method conflicts. Sure, it is redundant with git data if using git exclusively and if caring to import history like with gitsvn... in a context of exchange

[Pharo-dev] git and author/timestamps, 10000's of files, etc.

I've been skimming the ironically named "blame" thread and just want to clear up some apparent misconceptions. git/github is not the reason that the author/timestamps information was "lost" ... when tonel was introduced the author/timestamp info was not included in the format as a separately