Re: [Pharo-dev] interactive method definition (was Re: Calypso wishlist)

In fact I'm stupid because I already coded it by extending the parser and I lost the code. I should look around or redo it. On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: >> Is this your ideal, or mainly to align with Tonel? Because it seems Tonel >> was

Re: [Pharo-dev] interactive method definition (was Re: Calypso wishlist)

> Is this your ideal, or mainly to align with Tonel? Because it seems Tonel > was developed > without much consideration of interactive method definition -- which is fine > in as much as > Tonel was designed to quickly overcome a specific problem with Windows+Git, > but it > Tonel shouldn't be

[Pharo-dev] interactive method definition (was Re: Calypso wishlist)

On 9 February 2018 at 03:43, Nicolas Cellier < nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > Then you might have used kind of named block params like > MyClass >> [foo:aFoo bar:aBar | self foo: aFoo; bar: aBar] > > > > Le 8 févr. 2018 20:11, "Stephane Ducasse" a > écrit :