Am 11.02.2014 um 16:43 schrieb Christophe Demarey :
>
> Le 11 févr. 2014 à 16:15, Norbert Hartl a écrit :
>
>>
>> Am 11.02.2014 um 14:48 schrieb Christophe Demarey
>> :
>>
>>> Hi Norbert,
>>>
>>> Le 11 févr. 2014 à 11:05, Norbert Hartl a écrit :
>>>
I try really hard to move to 3.0 at
Le 11 févr. 2014 à 16:15, Norbert Hartl a écrit :
>
> Am 11.02.2014 um 14:48 schrieb Christophe Demarey
> :
>
>> Hi Norbert,
>>
>> Le 11 févr. 2014 à 11:05, Norbert Hartl a écrit :
>>
>>> I try really hard to move to 3.0 at the moment. To me versionner became
>>> that important that this is
It's hard to think this one through without use cases… On the positive, it
may be better to mark every numbered version as #'release' and then use
semantic versioning to update if you run into trouble (i.e. release 2.0 and
if you have to adjust the packages, 2.0.1). Because now that we have stable
Am 11.02.2014 um 14:48 schrieb Christophe Demarey :
> Hi Norbert,
>
> Le 11 févr. 2014 à 11:05, Norbert Hartl a écrit :
>
>> I try really hard to move to 3.0 at the moment. To me versionner became that
>> important that this is a requirement for me to change the version. I’m
>> testing the bl
Hi Norbert,
Le 11 févr. 2014 à 11:05, Norbert Hartl a écrit :
> I try really hard to move to 3.0 at the moment. To me versionner became that
> important that this is a requirement for me to change the version. I’m
> testing the bleeding edge version of versionner in 3.0 and this looks really
>
heh… answer that is Christophe's work :)
On 11 Feb 2014, at 11:54, Norbert Hartl wrote:
>
> Am 11.02.2014 um 10:07 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano :
>
>> hi Norbert.
>>
>> did you noticed that versionner is *already* in the image?
>>
> Hahaha…no :) That’s soo me! Ok, but it does not have much in
Am 11.02.2014 um 10:07 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano :
> hi Norbert.
>
> did you noticed that versionner is *already* in the image?
>
Hahaha…no :) That’s soo me! Ok, but it does not have much influence on my
question. I still don’t get how to just create a new development version or a
new versi
hi Norbert.
did you noticed that versionner is *already* in the image?
cheers,
Esteban
On 11 Feb 2014, at 11:05, Norbert Hartl wrote:
> I try really hard to move to 3.0 at the moment. To me versionner became that
> important that this is a requirement for me to change the version. I’m
> tes
I try really hard to move to 3.0 at the moment. To me versionner became that
important that this is a requirement for me to change the version. I’m testing
the bleeding edge version of versionner in 3.0 and this looks really cool. But
somehow I cannot create a development version of my project.
