I love objects but we should consider that they had memory constraints and soon
we will have them too
because we are starting to have them for Moose ;)
Stef
What strikes me is why such simple concept, which you can express with
couple words: methods in class can have categories, ends up
Thanks tobias.
To me your version of SS3 looks even more Squeak centric and this is ok but my
plate is full
and I'm sorry but I focus on Pharo because we must deliver and continue.
Now don't you think that joining effort on SmalltalkHub (did you see the name
is not PharoHub)
would make more
On Jun 29, 2013, at 9:29 AM, stephane ducasse stephane.duca...@gmail.com
wrote:
I love objects but we should consider that they had memory constraints and
soon we will have them too
because we are starting to have them for Moose ;)
then we need a better vm/object space/whatever... not to
Hi Marcus,
On 29 Jun 2013, at 11:12, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
OK, that seems OK.
The reason I was asking was because I wanted to know if this JavaScript bug
would hit us as well:
http://point.davidglasser.net/2013/06/27/surprising-javascript-memory-leak.html
It
Hi Sven,
I believe Damien said a while ago to switch to an official' pharo ppa instead
of his:
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pharo/stable/ubuntu raring main
(I still have both in my /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ :))
Thierry
De : Pharo-dev
Am 29.06.2013 um 11:12 schrieb Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr:
OK, that seems OK.
The reason I was asking was because I wanted to know if this JavaScript bug
would hit us as well:
http://point.davidglasser.net/2013/06/27/surprising-javascript-memory-leak.html
It is slightly
On Jun 29, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Norbert Hartl norb...@hartl.name wrote:
Thanks. So please let us separate problems. In the example from Sven there
are two problems:
- increase of memory per function invocation. That problem we don't have
Yes, you are right. I am not really knowledgeable
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM, GOUBIER Thierry
thierry.goub...@cea.fr wrote:
I believe Damien said a while ago to switch to an official' pharo ppa
instead of his:
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pharo/stable/ubuntu raring main
I think you are right. Users need to delete the old PPA
On OSX Lion w/ 8GB RAM, the first call gives me:
[PhilMac:~/Documents/Smalltalk/2-MyWorkspaces/workspaceMemTest
philippeback$] ./run.sh
memtest.st
uptime 0h0m0s
memory 25,004,440 bytes
old 19,213,728 bytes (76.81%)
young 5,384 bytes (0.0%)
used 19,219,112 bytes (76.9%)
free
I did some more experiments and that's the most I can get from the script,
no matter how much free memory there is on the machine.
Adding ./pharo --memory 2000m ... has no effect.
[PhilMac:~/Documents/Smalltalk/2-MyWorkspaces/workspaceMemTest
philippeback$] ./pharo Pharo.image memtest.st 501
Thanks, Theirry, Damien,
I did
$ sudo rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/cassou-pharo-quantal.list
$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:pharo/stable
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install pharo-vm-core
And all seems fine
$ pharo-vm-nox --version
3.9-7 #1 Mon Jun 17 09:28:43 UTC 2013 gcc 4.7.2
Hi,
for 32bit application you can never allocate whole 4GB as some memory
has to be reserved for kernel. The usual split is 2/2, sometimes 3/1. Plus,
the actual code must be somewhere in the memory as well as the stack.
Usually the real limit for 32bit application is somewhere like 1.8GB for
Ciao,
I work with a seaside application.
I have a printer device and i need to manage the use of it at one work
at time.
I think to use one Semaphore forMutualExclusion defined as variable
of the specific printerTicket device
Now i defined this code to
Hi Jan,
On 29 Jun 2013, at 17:12, Jan Vrany jan.vr...@fit.cvut.cz wrote:
Hi,
for 32bit application you can never allocate whole 4GB as some memory has to
be reserved for kernel. The usual split is 2/2, sometimes 3/1. Plus,
the actual code must be somewhere in the memory as well as the
On 29/06/13 17:45, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 29 Jun 2013, at 17:12, Jan Vrany jan.vr...@fit.cvut.cz wrote:
Hi,
for 32bit application you can never allocate whole 4GB as some memory has to be
reserved for kernel. The usual split is 2/2, sometimes 3/1. Plus,
the actual code must
And at one point, even if there was free memory, things went south.
[PhilMac:~/Documents/Smalltalk/2-MyWorkspaces/workspaceMemTest
philippeback$] ./pharo Pharo.image memtest.st 500 1024000
errno 12
mmap failed: Cannot allocate memory
[PhilMac:~/Documents/Smalltalk/2-MyWorkspaces/workspaceMemTest
An interesting run as it is not ending by a simple OutOfMemory but with a
lot of weird elements
[PhilMac:~/Documents/Smalltalk/2-MyWorkspaces/workspaceMemTest
philippeback$] ./pharo Pharo.image memtest.st 1200 1024000
memtest.st
uptime 0h0m0s
memory 25,004,456 bytes
old 19,213,080 bytes
Other than that it is possible to go quite far:
[PhilMac:~/Documents/Smalltalk/2-MyWorkspaces/workspaceMemTest
philippeback$] ./pharo Pharo.image memtest.st 1400 1024000
memtest.st
uptime 0h0m0s
memory 25,004,460 bytes
old 19,212,804 bytes (76.81%)
young 4,584 bytes (0.0%)
used
Ciao,
I work with a seaside application.
I would to hear that. I wish your success.
I have a printer device and i need to manage the use of it at one work
at time.
I think to use one Semaphore forMutualExclusion defined as variable
of the specific printerTicket
19 matches
Mail list logo
