[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #529: 21289 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in BasicBehaviorClassMetaclassTest

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #529 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #866 was integrated: "21289 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in BasicBehaviorClassMetaclassTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/866 Issue Url:

[Pharo-dev] Esteban's ChangeLog week of 5 February 2018

Hello! This is my weekly ChangeLog, from 5 February 2018 to 11 February 2018. You can see it in a better format by going here: http://log.smallworks.eu/web/search?from=5/2/2018=11/2/2018 ChangeLog = 6 February 2018: *... and packaging should be

Re: [Pharo-dev] what is

Hi Eliot, One could say that a pragma is a message without a method? I think pragmas were never been integrated properly into the system browser. We can browses pragmas with the PragmaCollection but what I mean is a pragma-aware browser. See for example, there are some pragmas where is easy to

Re: [Pharo-dev] what is

Hi Hernan, _,,,^..^,,,_ (phone) > On Feb 11, 2018, at 10:47 AM, Hernán Morales Durand > wrote: > > I don't know, but how you you find documentation about specific pragmas? The best way is to ensure the pragma has at least one implementation, i.e. there is at

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #528: 21322 LayoutFrameTest testIdentity should not use deprecated method fraction:

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #528 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #869 was integrated: "21322 LayoutFrameTest testIdentity should not use deprecated method fraction:" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/869 Issue Url:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Do we remove EyeInspector from Pharo 70?

I sometimes use the Eye Pointer Inspector to find memory leaks ... is there a replacement for that? Peter On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 9:29 PM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > I would vote for. > > Stef > >

Re: [Pharo-dev] what is

This is one of the problem we will have to fix one of these days. Pragmas are missing PragmasType as we talk about it in the past. On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 7:47 PM, Hernán Morales Durand wrote: > I don't know, but how you you find documentation about specific pragmas? >

Re: [Pharo-dev] flow to contribute?

Tx for the explanation. I would not make things more complex. So I would not go on guessing. And I would not do 1 and 2. I would just add an iceberg menu contribute to Pharo and it just shows a large message and/or sets some stuff for me. Stef On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Esteban Lorenzano

[Pharo-dev] Do we remove EyeInspector from Pharo 70?

I would vote for. Stef

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg package addition

Tx denis. On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > There is already issue Unable commit new added package > > 2018-02-11 19:27 GMT+01:00 Stephane Ducasse : >> >> Hi esteban >> >> each time I add a new packages to an iceberg

Re: [Pharo-dev] Cleaning up... baseClass, instanceSide, theNonMetaclass

2018-02-11 18:14 GMT+01:00 Stephane Ducasse : > Hi > > We already got this discussion and I plan to address it. > Now I discovered that in addition to instanceSide and theNonMetaclass we > have > > - classClass and baseClass > - theMetaclass and theNonMetaclass > -

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg package addition

There is already issue Unable commit new added package 2018-02-11 19:27 GMT+01:00 Stephane Ducasse : > Hi esteban > > each time I add a new packages to an iceberg project I get the same DNU > > KeyNotFound: why the name

Re: [Pharo-dev] flow to contribute?

> On 11 Feb 2018, at 18:46, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > > Hi > > It looks like the flow to contribute changed. I do not find the > fogbugz integration pop up anymore. > Where is it? Was is changed? > So I create a branch manually and commit in my fork and did a pull

Re: [Pharo-dev] what is

I don't know, but how you you find documentation about specific pragmas? Hernán 2018-02-11 14:48 GMT-03:00 Stephane Ducasse : > Hi > > what is this pragma in metaclass method? > > Stef >

[Pharo-dev] Iceberg package addition

Hi esteban each time I add a new packages to an iceberg project I get the same DNU KeyNotFound: why the name of my new package (which I added). packageNamed: packageName ^ self savedPackagesDictionary at: packageName

[Pharo-dev] what is

Hi what is this pragma in metaclass method? Stef

[Pharo-dev] flow to contribute?

Hi It looks like the flow to contribute changed. I do not find the fogbugz integration pop up anymore. Where is it? Was is changed? So I create a branch manually and commit in my fork and did a pull request but this is not clear. Stef

[Pharo-dev] Cleaning up... baseClass, instanceSide, theNonMetaclass

Hi We already got this discussion and I plan to address it. Now I discovered that in addition to instanceSide and theNonMetaclass we have - classClass and baseClass - theMetaclass and theNonMetaclass - instanceSide and classSide

Re: [Pharo-dev] Do we remove TClass?

Then I do not get it what it this Trait >> private_subclass: t instanceVariableNames: f classVariableNames: d poolDictionaries: s package: cat "Compatibility purposes" ^self error: 'Traits cannot have subclasses'. How raising an error would make something compatible To be this is

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #527: 21298 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in TraitPureBehaviorTest

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #527 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #858 was integrated: "21298 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in TraitPureBehaviorTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/858 Issue Url:

Re: [Pharo-dev] will be Cargo in Pharo 7?

Christophe restarted to work on it after the launcher and his plans (told me that last week) is to have a version as soon as possible. We should be able to experiment for real now. Stef On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Peter Uhnák wrote: > Hi, > > I remember at ESUG someone

[Pharo-dev] Do we remove TClass?

Hi Happy core developers do we remove TClass? Because it is duplicated code, no? Stef

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #526: 21288 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in IntegerTest

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #526 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #867 was integrated: "21288 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in IntegerTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/867 Issue Url:

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #525: 21306 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in FractionTest

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #525 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #850 was integrated: "21306 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in FractionTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/850 Issue Url:

[Pharo-dev] will be Cargo in Pharo 7?

Hi, I remember at ESUG someone saying that cargo ought to be added to P7 around the end of the year (2017/2018). But considering there was no development on Cargo in over half a year, this doesn't seem to be a likely scenario even in the near future. Are there any new plans in regards to cargo?

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #524: 21309 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in SemaphoreTest

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #524 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #847 was integrated: "21309 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in SemaphoreTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/847 Issue Url:

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #523: 21313 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in DelayTest

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #523 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #843 was integrated: "21313 Remove unnecessary "self run:" in DelayTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/843 Issue Url:

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #522: 21283 Improve TimeZone offset: comment

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #522 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #837 was integrated: "21283 Improve TimeZone offset: comment" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/837 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21283 Build Url:

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #521: 21282 Use "utilities" category in FileStream

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #521 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #836 was integrated: "21282 Use "utilities" category in FileStream" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/836 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21282