Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] OSSubprocess first milestone

2016-01-14 Thread David T. Lewis
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:33:56PM -0300, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Dear all, > > I am happy to tell you I have a first prototype of the tool for executing > OS processes: > > https://github.com/marianopeck/OSSubprocess > > As I said many times, the main idea was to be as much as possible

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] OSSubprocess first milestone

2016-01-14 Thread stepharo
Thanks Mariano! Stef Le 14/1/16 19:33, Mariano Martinez Peck a écrit : Dear all, I am happy to tell you I have a first prototype of the tool for executing OS processes: https://github.com/marianopeck/OSSubprocess As I said many times, the main idea was to be as much as possible

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] OSSubprocess first milestone

2016-01-14 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
Awesome work Mariano , I love the documentation. Question : Does your library use the new FFI (Unified FFi) ? On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:36 PM stepharo wrote: > Thanks Mariano! > > Stef > > Le 14/1/16 19:33, Mariano Martinez Peck a écrit : > > Dear all, > > I am happy to tell

[Pharo-dev] [ANN] OSSubprocess first milestone

2016-01-14 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
Dear all, I am happy to tell you I have a first prototype of the tool for executing OS processes: https://github.com/marianopeck/OSSubprocess As I said many times, the main idea was to be as much as possible FFI-based, only for executing OS commands and, from my point of view, a better

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] OSSubprocess first milestone

2016-01-14 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > Awesome work Mariano , I love the documentation. > > Question : Does your library use the new FFI (Unified FFi) ? > > It does use the new FFI which is in latest Pharo 5.0. The Unified FFI as far as I understand in