Re: [Pharo-dev] [squeak-dev] Re: MC should really write snaphsot/source.st in UTF8

2013-05-23 Thread Henrik Sperre Johansen
On 23.05.2013 03:59, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote: For Pharo, I'd guess so, too. (I heard that the Japanese support is pretty much dropped in Pharo.) -- If you mean using leadingChar to indicate WideStrings using non-unicode encoding, and Bitmapped fonts with multiple sets for non-latin1 ranges ta

Re: [Pharo-dev] [squeak-dev] Re: MC should really write snaphsot/source.st in UTF8

2013-05-22 Thread stephane ducasse
>> > > For Pharo, I'd guess so, too. > > (I heard that the Japanese support is pretty much dropped in Pharo.) Probably because none of us has the knowledge to understand how it works and see the problems. > > -- > -- Yoshiki >

Re: [Pharo-dev] [squeak-dev] Re: MC should really write snaphsot/source.st in UTF8

2013-05-22 Thread Yoshiki Ohshima
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: > MC never wrote a BOM, so we don't have to be compatible with BOM. > > If we can simplify the process, let's simplify, because maintaining useless > compatibility costs, the code is really crooked by now, and this leads to > mis-understandin

Re: [Pharo-dev] [squeak-dev] Re: MC should really write snaphsot/source.st in UTF8

2013-05-22 Thread Yoshiki Ohshima
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: > First thing would be to simplify #setConverterForCode and > #selectTextConverterForCode. > Do we still want to use a MacRomanTextConverter, seriously? I'm not even > sure I've got that many files with that encoding on my Mac-OSX... > Do we

Re: [Pharo-dev] [squeak-dev] Re: MC should really write snaphsot/source.st in UTF8

2013-05-22 Thread Nicolas Cellier
MC never wrote a BOM, so we don't have to be compatible with BOM. If we can simplify the process, let's simplify, because maintaining useless compatibility costs, the code is really crooked by now, and this leads to mis-understanding, and soon to broken features and noise. Currently, snapshot/sour