[Pharo-dev] ComposableModelinitialExtent

2014-03-12 Thread Laurent Laffont
Hi, I'm trying to have tests green for TWM. I found: ComposableModelinitialExtent ^ nil on superclass Model there's ModelinitialExtent ^ RealEstateAgent standardWindowExtent that sounds good. So I don't understand why ComposableModel redefine #initialExtent to answer nil. Any

Re: [Pharo-dev] ComposableModelinitialExtent

2014-03-12 Thread Benjamin
The first answer is: ComposableModel was not a subclass of model at first :P Ben On 12 Mar 2014, at 13:09, Laurent Laffont laurent.laff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to have tests green for TWM. I found: ComposableModelinitialExtent ^ nil on superclass Model there's

Re: [Pharo-dev] ComposableModelinitialExtent

2014-03-12 Thread Laurent Laffont
As far as I see, it seems safe to remove ComposableModelinitialExtent Spec tests green, TWM tests green and I haven't seen any problem yet. What do you think ? Laurent Le mercredi 12 mars 2014, 17:36:20 Benjamin a écrit : The first answer is: ComposableModel was not a subclass of model

Re: [Pharo-dev] ComposableModelinitialExtent

2014-03-12 Thread Benjamin
Sounds good :P I will integrate it into Spec dev (I think it’s safer for now to not remove it into Pharo since it’s frozen) Ben On 12 Mar 2014, at 19:04, Laurent Laffont laurent.laff...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I see, it seems safe to remove ComposableModelinitialExtent Spec tests