Perfectly fine for daily use. At the moment there are no
high-impact changes going on (like we had in 3 with RPackage
and Opal) that take some time to stabilize. Once in a while
there is a build that is less usable. As long as you follow the
mailing list and commit often, no problem.
Stephan
I am using it on a daily basis for implementing various analyses. I see no
downside to using it.
Doru
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com
wrote:
Is anyone successfully using it for everyday development on their own
projects? How painless/ful is it? Thanks
Is anyone successfully using it for everyday development on their own
projects? How painless/ful is it? Thanks
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/How-Stable-is-Pharo-4-0-tp4803645.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
On 04 Feb 2015, at 15:21, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:
Is anyone successfully using it for everyday development on their own
projects? How painless/ful is it? Thanks
Hard to say… the amount of new bugs reported is quite low.
Subjectively it feels stable to me, but than
Well I would not just call it painless more like a very big improvement
over Pharo 3. No strange bugs and abnormal behaviour so far , and I have
been using it for more than a year.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com
wrote:
Is anyone successfully using it for
Am 04.02.2015 um 15:21 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com:
Is anyone successfully using it for everyday development on their own
projects? How painless/ful is it? Thanks
I work now on a daily basis with it. The downside ist that some DNUs lead to
infinite loops in somewhere
