Thanks, it looks cool
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 12:12 PM Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> And here is the PR, I hope it is OK:
>
> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/8977
>
> > On 7 Apr 2021, at 11:53, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pablo, Guille,
> >
> > Thanks for the links.
> >
And here is the PR, I hope it is OK:
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/8977
> On 7 Apr 2021, at 11:53, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
> Hi Pablo, Guille,
>
> Thanks for the links.
>
> You can consider the Zn/Zdc failures fixed. Something changed recently with
> the Google query
Hi Pablo, Guille,
Thanks for the links.
You can consider the Zn/Zdc failures fixed. Something changed recently with the
Google query service so that it now includes a redirect. The full ZnClient
follows those without any problems, but these tests are much more primitive and
can't handle a
> El 6 abr 2021, a las 22:55, Sven Van Caekenberghe escribió:
>
> I agree, could you post a link to or a list of the broken tests ?
Sure :)
The CI:
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/Pharo9.0/
Hi Sven,
Here there is:
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/Pharo9.0/1286/testReport/
Thanks,
Pablo
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:56 PM Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> I agree, could you post a link to or a list of the broken
I agree, could you post a link to or a list of the broken tests ?
> On 6 Apr 2021, at 22:54, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> With Pablo we were discussing that it would be nice to stop with the
> integrations until we fix the broken tests.
> We have crossed the 20 broken tests for
