--- Begin Message ---
Hi Mariano
Yeah, that was probably the first thing i have ever looked at in regards to
code completion because the beginning of this journey for me was figuring
out the difference between regular and OCompletion (NEC, that used to be
the default until a month and a half ago,
Hi Myroslava,
That sounds very interesting. I guess you did take a look to Romain Robbes
work on OCompletion, right?
I have used it for a long time, many years ago, and AFAIR we had to remove
it from Pharo. It had lots of issues with the memory used to keep track of
your "history" in order to be
--- Begin Message ---
Hi
Stef, thanks for the paper, i'll check it out. I agree that there's many
cool things that can be still done statistically, but the ML/NLP approach
should be worth trying out, too. Maybe it will give good results, maybe it
will turn out to be not applicable to Pharo for
+1 for the completion of framework (spec) constructs.
https://tabnine.com/blog/deep
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019, 12:33 Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It certainly would be interesting!
>
> The other thing to look for are completion of larger constructs. For
> example, in the context of Spec, I am sure
Hi,
It certainly would be interesting!
The other thing to look for are completion of larger constructs. For example,
in the context of Spec, I am sure you can complete larger templates for various
methods.
Cheers,
Doru
> On Aug 15, 2019, at 8:48 AM, ducasse wrote:
>
> hello miroslava
>
--- Begin Message ---
for anyone interested, made a blog post about researching some of the
existing approaches of combining ML to improve code completion. in pharo we
want to try training the n-gram model. have a slight idea of how it might
be implemented in practice but mostly still trying to
