Re: [Pharo-dev] The 6.1 Space Monkey is unhappy

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > 2018-03-05 14:14 GMT+01:00 Stephane Ducasse : >> Hi pavel >> >> when I'm back can you explain to me because I did not get it :). > > :) it is simple. If you want to ignore issues that the

Re: [Pharo-dev] The 6.1 Space Monkey is unhappy

this sounds a bit like smart-test (that tries to identify the tests to re-run after a method is changed) Smarttest can work - on dynamic data: first run the tests to know what test cause what methods to be executed; then if such method is modified, re-run the associated tests - on static

Re: [Pharo-dev] The 6.1 Space Monkey is unhappy

2018-03-05 14:14 GMT+01:00 Stephane Ducasse : > Hi pavel > > when I'm back can you explain to me because I did not get it :). :) it is simple. If you want to ignore issues that the slice is not adding, you need to know which of them to ignore. That's why the original

Re: [Pharo-dev] The 6.1 Space Monkey is unhappy

Hi pavel when I'm back can you explain to me because I did not get it :). Stef On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > 2018-03-05 10:54 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker : >> >> >>> On 5 Mar 2018, at 10:27, Alistair Grant

Re: [Pharo-dev] The 6.1 Space Monkey is unhappy

>> >> What needs to be done? >> >> -> your change can be accepted as we know it does not fail more fixes >> -> then we need fix the tests in Pharo6 >> -> in a perfect world we would update the slice checker to only fail for >> now test failing… (it used to be lille that…). > > I must say that

Re: [Pharo-dev] The 6.1 Space Monkey is unhappy

2018-03-05 10:54 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker : > > >> On 5 Mar 2018, at 10:27, Alistair Grant wrote: >> >> Hi Marcus, >> >> On 5 March 2018 at 09:23, Marcus Denker wrote: >>> >>> On 5 Mar 2018, at 09:16, Alistair Grant

Re: [Pharo-dev] The 6.1 Space Monkey is unhappy

> On 5 Mar 2018, at 10:27, Alistair Grant wrote: > > Hi Marcus, > > On 5 March 2018 at 09:23, Marcus Denker wrote: >> >> >>> On 5 Mar 2018, at 09:16, Alistair Grant wrote: >>> >>> Hi Esteban & Marcus, >>> >>> I'm

Re: [Pharo-dev] The 6.1 Space Monkey is unhappy

Hi Marcus, On 5 March 2018 at 09:23, Marcus Denker wrote: > > >> On 5 Mar 2018, at 09:16, Alistair Grant wrote: >> >> Hi Esteban & Marcus, >> >> I'm getting repeated validation failures for: >> >> https://pharo.manuscript.com/f/cases/21431 >> >> >>

Re: [Pharo-dev] The 6.1 Space Monkey is unhappy

> On 5 Mar 2018, at 09:16, Alistair Grant wrote: > > Hi Esteban & Marcus, > > I'm getting repeated validation failures for: > > https://pharo.manuscript.com/f/cases/21431 > > > It's the same set of tests that fail each time, and as far as I can > tell they have

[Pharo-dev] The 6.1 Space Monkey is unhappy

Hi Esteban & Marcus, I'm getting repeated validation failures for: https://pharo.manuscript.com/f/cases/21431 It's the same set of tests that fail each time, and as far as I can tell they have nothing to do with the patch I submitted. Do you know if this is happening on other tests? Thanks