Re: [Pharo-dev] FilePlugin maximum size

2015-06-07 Thread Norbert Hartl
How do I get the version of the Mac vm? The date of the plist file is from 
April. Has it been turned just recently?

Norbert

 Am 07.06.2015 um 17:40 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com:
 
 they are
 although you need to use latest vm :)
 
 Esteban
 
 On 07 Jun 2015, at 17:06, Norbert Hartl norb...@hartl.name wrote:
 
 
 Am 07.06.2015 um 17:01 schrieb David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com:
 
 On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Norbert Hartl wrote:
 I just encountered a
 
 
 
 I guess it is because the position of 1073750701 is just slightly bigger 
 than (2 raisedTo: 30 = 1073741824). Is there a way to get a full 32 bit 
 range?
 
 
 You need a VM compiled with large file support 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support
 
 For gcc, the compiler flag is -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
 
 Thanks. What are the reasons for not having that turned by default?
 
 Norbert
 
 
 
 




Re: [Pharo-dev] FilePlugin maximum size

2015-06-07 Thread Norbert Hartl

 Am 07.06.2015 um 17:01 schrieb David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com:
 
 On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Norbert Hartl wrote:
 I just encountered a
 
 
 
 I guess it is because the position of 1073750701 is just slightly bigger 
 than (2 raisedTo: 30 = 1073741824). Is there a way to get a full 32 bit 
 range?
 
 
 You need a VM compiled with large file support 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support
 
 For gcc, the compiler flag is -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
 
Thanks. What are the reasons for not having that turned by default?

Norbert




Re: [Pharo-dev] FilePlugin maximum size

2015-06-07 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
they are
although you need to use latest vm :)

Esteban

 On 07 Jun 2015, at 17:06, Norbert Hartl norb...@hartl.name wrote:
 
 
 Am 07.06.2015 um 17:01 schrieb David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com:
 
 On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Norbert Hartl wrote:
 I just encountered a
 
 
 
 I guess it is because the position of 1073750701 is just slightly bigger 
 than (2 raisedTo: 30 = 1073741824). Is there a way to get a full 32 bit 
 range?
 
 
 You need a VM compiled with large file support 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support
 
 For gcc, the compiler flag is -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
 
 Thanks. What are the reasons for not having that turned by default?
 
 Norbert
 
 




Re: [Pharo-dev] FilePlugin maximum size

2015-06-07 Thread David T. Lewis
On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Norbert Hartl wrote:
 I just encountered a
 
  
 
 I guess it is because the position of 1073750701 is just slightly bigger than 
 (2 raisedTo: 30 = 1073741824). Is there a way to get a full 32 bit range?


You need a VM compiled with large file support 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support

For gcc, the compiler flag is -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

Dave

 



Re: [Pharo-dev] FilePlugin maximum size

2015-06-07 Thread Eliot Miranda
Hi Norbert,

as a stop gap you should be able to use a Mac VM from my site, e.g.
http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r3370/.  All these VMs have
been compiled with large file support.  HTH

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Norbert Hartl norb...@hartl.name wrote:

 How do I get the version of the Mac vm? The date of the plist file is from
 April. Has it been turned just recently?

 Norbert

  Am 07.06.2015 um 17:40 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com:
 
  they are
  although you need to use latest vm :)
 
  Esteban
 
  On 07 Jun 2015, at 17:06, Norbert Hartl norb...@hartl.name wrote:
 
 
  Am 07.06.2015 um 17:01 schrieb David T. Lewis le...@mail.msen.com:
 
  On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Norbert Hartl wrote:
  I just encountered a
 
 
 
  I guess it is because the position of 1073750701 is just slightly
 bigger than (2 raisedTo: 30 = 1073741824). Is there a way to get a full 32
 bit range?
 
 
  You need a VM compiled with large file support
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support
 
  For gcc, the compiler flag is -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
 
  Thanks. What are the reasons for not having that turned by default?
 
  Norbert
 
 
 
 





-- 
best,
Eliot