e.be
[p...@highoctane.be]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:25 AM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] SciSmalltalk
It would be just as nice to be able to integrate R through some kind of bridge.
I am using R as well over here. And wxMaxima.
What is interesting
> Simula? ;-)
:)
no smalltalk of course :)
Stef
Simula? ;-)
2012/3/29 Stéphane Ducasse
> SciTalk
> Mathalk
> MathTalk
> SmallMath
>
> :)
>
> On Mar 29, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>
> > Yes sure.
> > Anyone has a better name than SciSmalltalk ;-) ?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> > wrote:
> >> s
> *From:* pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [
> pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Francisco Garau
> [francisco.ga...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:19 AM
> *To:* Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-proj
SciTalk
Mathalk
MathTalk
SmallMath
:)
On Mar 29, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
> Yes sure.
> Anyone has a better name than SciSmalltalk ;-) ?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> wrote:
>> serge
>>
>> could you start a wiki page with all the current resources
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
wrote:
> serge
>
> could you start a wiki page with all the current resources?
> Like that we get a first impression.
> It would be good to think about package names too (I do not really like DHB
> for example in the package name).
ok i start a l
-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of p...@highoctane.be
[p...@highoctane.be]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:25 AM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] SciSmalltalk
It would be just as nice to be able to integrate R through some kind of bridge.
I am using
o Garau
[francisco.ga...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:19 AM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] SciSmalltalk
There is a GSoC project to have R-bindings in Smalltalk.
That would be just amazing!
Very useful for a lot of applications (incl
Alexandre Bergel
[alexandre.ber...@me.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:16 AM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Cc: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] SciSmalltalk
For what I need R, Pharo can easily be better. Just an EyeSee pdf exporter will
give me
Num?
NumericalPackage?
- Francisco
On 29 Mar 2012, at 14:12, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
> Yes sure.
> Anyone has a better name than SciSmalltalk ;-) ?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> wrote:
>> serge
>>
>> could you start a wiki page with all the current resources?
>
Yes sure.
Anyone has a better name than SciSmalltalk ;-) ?
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
wrote:
> serge
>
> could you start a wiki page with all the current resources?
> Like that we get a first impression.
> It would be good to think about package names too (I do not really
serge
could you start a wiki page with all the current resources?
Like that we get a first impression.
It would be good to think about package names too (I do not really like DHB for
example in the package name).
Stef
On Mar 29, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 201
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Francisco Garau
wrote:
> There is a GSoC project to have R-bindings in Smalltalk.
>
> That would be just amazing!
>
> Very useful for a lot of applications (including finance)
Yes sure, this is great, but usually this kind of project (binding
with another language
r...@me.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 8:44 AM
> > To: Moose-related development
> > Cc: Pharo Development
> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] SciSmalltalk
> >
> > Hi Serge!
> >
> > I welcome very much this initiative.
> > Somethi
-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [
> pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Alexandre
> Bergel [alexandre.ber...@me.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 8:44 AM
> To: Moose-related development
> Cc: Pharo Development
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] Sc
__
> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> [pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Alexandre Bergel
> [alexandre.ber...@me.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 8:44 AM
> To: Moose-related development
> Cc: Pharo Development
> Subject: Re: [Pha
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Nicolas Cellier
wrote:
> Le 28 mars 2012 14:44, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :
>
>> Hi Serge!
>>
>> I welcome very much this initiative.
>> Something that I believe is important, is an pdf graph exporter (maybe
>> based on EyeSee) and the various test distribution (e.
: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] SciSmalltalk
Hi Serge!
I welcome very much this initiative.
Something that I believe is important, is an pdf graph exporter (maybe based on
EyeSee) and the various test distribution (e.g., CHI). The fact that these two
are missing is exactly the reason why I use R and
yes first step first
> I welcome very much this initiative.
> Something that I believe is important, is an pdf graph exporter (maybe based
> on EyeSee) and the various test distribution (e.g., CHI). The fact that these
> two are missing is exactly the reason why I use R and Numbers instead of
Le 28 mars 2012 14:44, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :
> Hi Serge!
>
> I welcome very much this initiative.
> Something that I believe is important, is an pdf graph exporter (maybe
> based on EyeSee) and the various test distribution (e.g., CHI). The fact
> that these two are missing is exactly the re
Hi Serge!
I welcome very much this initiative.
Something that I believe is important, is an pdf graph exporter (maybe based on
EyeSee) and the various test distribution (e.g., CHI). The fact that these two
are missing is exactly the reason why I use R and Numbers instead of Pharo.
I sincerely b
21 matches
Mail list logo
