2010/1/13 Michael Rueger :
> On 1/13/2010 11:13 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> Next step is removing a direct reference to Sensor global, and replace
>> it with something like:
>>
>> self eventSensor
>
> No, that is fixing a sympton, not the problem.
> (John will love this ;-) )
>
> You would still
thanks mike
I really want to clean that part too.
And we will do it.
This is why I need a bit of supervision and time.
Stef
On Jan 13, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Michael Rueger wrote:
> On 1/13/2010 11:13 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> Next step is removing a direct reference to Sensor global, and
On 1/13/2010 11:13 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> Next step is removing a direct reference to Sensor global, and replace
> it with something like:
>
> self eventSensor
No, that is fixing a sympton, not the problem.
(John will love this ;-) )
You would still be polling the sensor. There should be no
2010/1/13 Stéphane Ducasse :
>>
>>> do you have one example so that I can evaluate?
>>
>> there are differents use cases of referencing Sensor (Except examples which
>> could simple be removed from the image).
>>
>> - asking for the current cursor position (which is the majority of the
>> referen
>
>> do you have one example so that I can evaluate?
>
> there are differents use cases of referencing Sensor (Except examples which
> could simple be removed from the image).
>
> - asking for the current cursor position (which is the majority of the
> references)
> e.g.
> 'Scanning ', aFile l
>
>> what are the next steps with should do for the
>>
>> Sensor references in the system
>> 166
>> and the
>>
>> I would really to do some steps in the direction of cleaning what should be
>> left to do.
>>
>> I'm confused by the comment
>>
>> "The usage of these funtions
