Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration
browser more visible?
Let me repeat it again (reread the vision document)
we will put in place a process that:
- check all the configurations of a given repository (for each versions)
so for example for
Sounds great!
We have encountered two main problems in getting the DBXTalk tools
(including supporting tools, Glorp, etc.) loaded:
1) 64-bit vs 32-bit crossover problems with FFI, and
2) proper configuration patterns (online Configuration snippets with
errors) and sequencing.
-Cam
On Wed, May 2
Let me repeat it again (reread the vision document)
we will put in place a process that:
- check all the configurations of a given repository (for each
versions)
so for example for MetaRepoForPharo1.4 and MetaRepoForPharo20…
- each configuration will be loaded, test runs,
_
From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
[pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Norbert Hartl
[norb...@hartl.name]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 3:54 AM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser
m
oun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Sean P. DeNigris
> [s...@clipperadams.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 6:44 PM
> To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration
> browser more visible?
>
> Dale
] on behalf of Sean P. DeNigris
[s...@clipperadams.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 6:44 PM
To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser
more visible?
Dale Henrichs wrote
>
> In my last post, I provided my vision
- Original Message -
| From: "Sean P. DeNigris"
| Dale Henrichs wrote
| >
| > If you don't want to experience the pain of developing on a new
| > platform,
| > then don't move to the new platform until the hubbub has died down
| > ...
| >
| I'm perfectly happy, but it seemed like nobod
Dale Henrichs wrote
>
> In my last post, I provided my vision of the future
>
That was very helpful. I can see the big picture much better now...
Dale Henrichs wrote
>
> If you don't want to experience the pain of developing on a new platform,
> then don't move to the new platform until the h
uot; have a gap to close... and you should
| expect them to close it...
|
| Dale
| - Original Message -
| | From: "Wilhelm K Schwab"
| | To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
| | Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 11:23:14 AM
| | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making
...
Dale
- Original Message -
| From: "Wilhelm K Schwab"
| To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
| Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 11:23:14 AM
| Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about makingthe configuration
browser more visible?
|
| It seems very reasonable to
9:08:17 PM
| Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser
more visible?
|
|
| Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote
| >
| > Put another way, if it's that simple, why all the contrary
| > instructions
| > over time?
| >
|
| I understand your frustration. We a
ot;Sean P. DeNigris"
| To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
| Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 9:08:17 PM
| Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making theconfiguration browser
more visible?
|
|
| Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote
| >
| > Put another way, if it's that simple, why all t
o
> [guillermopol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 1:37 PM
> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser more
> visible?
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K
> wrote:
> It
-
| From: "Wilhelm K Schwab"
| To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
| Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 11:23:14 AM
| Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration
browser more visible?
|
| It seems very reasonable to have such a crucial infrastructure
...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
[pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Sean P. DeNigris
[s...@clipperadams.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 12:08 AM
To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser
more visible?
Schwab,Wilhelm K
Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote
>
> Put another way, if it's that simple, why all the contrary instructions
> over time?
>
I understand your frustration. We are like parents watching a child grow
up...
For one thing, the API has been evolving as we've learned. From
loadLast/Latest, to bleedingEdge/deve
oject@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser more
> visible?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K
> wrote:
> I know it's not a popular opinion, but overall, they don't work. It is
@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configurationbrowser
more visible?
On Apr 27, 2012, at 8:38 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> I'm simply saying that we have a problem. When I first saw the config
> browser, I had hoped that it would bring the problem t
On Apr 27, 2012, at 8:38 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> I'm simply saying that we have a problem. When I first saw the config
> browser, I had hoped that it would bring the problem to light and spur a fix.
> As it is now, there are too many quirks and caveats for the browser to have
> any mea
project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr>]
on behalf of Guillermo Polito
[guillermopol...@gmail.com<mailto:guillermopol...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 1:37 PM
To:
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] W
l.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, April 27, 2012 1:37 PM
>
> *To:* Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration
> browser more visible?
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K > wrote:
>
>> It's nice th
t;mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr>]
on behalf of Guillermo Polito
[guillermopol...@gmail.com<mailto:guillermopol...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 12:26 PM
To:
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Subject: Re:
2 12:26 PM
>
> *To:* Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration
> browser more visible?
>
> I meant:
>
> Example of 1) is you loading OmniBrowser or Nautilus.
> Example of 2) is your project using a specific versio
l.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 12:26 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser more
visible?
I meant:
Example of 1) is you loading OmniBrowser or Nautilus.
Example of 2) is your project using a specific version of XmlSu
-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Guillermo Polito
[guillermopol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 12:26 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser more
visible?
Wat? Probably there was a misunderstood...
1) if you a
figurations)? it's done
>> like this in st-code:
>>
>> ConfigurationOfXYZ project load: #stable
>>
>>
>> > ________
>> > From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [
>> pharo-project-boun...@lists.
orge.inria.fr [
> pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Camillo Bruni [
> camillobr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:40 PM
> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration
> browser
April 26, 2012 7:40 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser
more visible?
On 2012-04-27, at 01:17, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> Can they really download stuff? How much? Until the configurations are
>
-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Camillo Bruni
[camillobr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:40 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser
more visible?
On 2012-04-27, at 01:17, Schwab,Wilh
ucasse
> [stephane.duca...@inria.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:17 PM
> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser
> more visible?
>
> Ok for me.
> Package Maps Loader
>
> St
oject-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Stéphane Ducasse
[stephane.duca...@inria.fr]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:17 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] What about making the configuration browser
more visible?
Ok for me.
Package Maps Loader
Stef
> What
Ok for me.
Package Maps Loader
Stef
> What about naming it "Package Loader" or "Package center" or something like
> that?
> And putting it in the main menu instead of inside of Tools?
>
> I want people who open pharo for the first time to say "Hey, here I can
> download stuff!!!"
>
> Guille
What about naming it "Package Loader" or "Package center" or something like
that?
And putting it in the main menu instead of inside of Tools?
I want people who open pharo for the first time to say "Hey, here I can
download stuff!!!"
Guille
33 matches
Mail list logo