No problem, I'm sorry i cannot do anything until tomorrow.
Cheers,
Fabrizio
2012/1/16 Frank Shearar
> Thanks, Fabrizio. It did indeed look more serious than SS being
> difficult: I was getting No Route to Host errors, so looked more
> network related than SS.
>
> frank
>
> On 16 January 2012 16
Thanks, Fabrizio. It did indeed look more serious than SS being
difficult: I was getting No Route to Host errors, so looked more
network related than SS.
frank
On 16 January 2012 16:54, Fabrizio Perin wrote:
> Well, all our servers are down. Try tommorow.
>
>
>
> 2012/1/16 Frank Shearar
>>
>> h
Well, all our servers are down. Try tommorow.
2012/1/16 Frank Shearar
> http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.squeaksource.com
>
> Hooray for ss3.gemstone.com!
>
> frank
>
>
2011/2/22 Yanni Chiu
> On 22/02/11 6:34 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
>> Anyway, putting it on a newer Linux based server (shouldn't have to
>> cost that much) and adding some of the standard tools to monitor the
>> process and reboot it if necessary will probably already help a lot.
>>
>
>
On 22 Feb 2011, at 13:54, Yanni Chiu wrote:
> On 22/02/11 6:34 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>> Anyway, putting it on a newer Linux based server (shouldn't have to
>> cost that much) and adding some of the standard tools to monitor the
>> process and reboot it if necessary will probably alread
On 22/02/11 6:34 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Anyway, putting it on a newer Linux based server (shouldn't have to
cost that much) and adding some of the standard tools to monitor the
process and reboot it if necessary will probably already help a lot.
But simply rebooting the image may not
Le 21/02/2011 16:48, Fabrizio Perin a écrit :
> to solve it (surely you can find lots of email from Stephan talking
> about this). I'm trying to keep the system alive.
>
Thanks ;)
Hilaire
I think that Monticello as it is today is pretty good. I remember working in
Smalltalk without something like Monticello and it was a PITA. My first
experiences with Envy were that it was very complex, hard to use and hugely
overpriced.
The fact that we all hate it so much when SqueakSource is
On 02/22/2011 10:21 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 22 February 2011 08:21, Philippe Marschall
wrote:
On 02/21/2011 05:39 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
On Feb 21, 2011, at 17:22 , Camillo Bruni wrote:
how about a file based system and git?
yea, just discussed this very idea an hour ago...
The
On 22 February 2011 08:21, Philippe Marschall
wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 05:39 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 21, 2011, at 17:22 , Camillo Bruni wrote:
>>
>>> how about a file based system and git?
>>
>> yea, just discussed this very idea an hour ago...
>>
>> The simplest thing that could wor
Chris Muller-3 wrote:
>
>>> how about a file based system and git?
>
> -1.
>
Hang on, I think we may be missing the point here. There is no need to all
agree or come to a consensus as someone else mentioned here. I would like
to think that Pharo is open minded enough to accept other alterna
On 02/21/2011 05:39 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2011, at 17:22 , Camillo Bruni wrote:
>
>> how about a file based system and git?
>
> yea, just discussed this very idea an hour ago...
>
> The simplest thing that could work:
> - Write out changes to files (for each method and class
Camillo, actually Lukas did something with Monticello and my GitFS package
called "MonticelloGit". There's only one version so far and I haven't looked at
it but if anyone's interested, you can find the package on SqueakSouce:
http://www.squeaksource.com/GitFS.html
Max
On 21.02.2011, at 23:35
On 2011-02-21, at 22:52, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>> Max Leske, a student in bern started to write a git library for smalltalk.
>> so there should be already quite some stuff available.
>> but AFAIK there is no MC adapter yet.
>
> I do not have much experience with Git, but do you think it is fea
> Max Leske, a student in bern started to write a git library for smalltalk. so
> there should be already quite some stuff available.
> but AFAIK there is no MC adapter yet.
I do not have much experience with Git, but do you think it is feasible to have
such adapter?
Alexandre
>
> personally
I'm in!
Max Leske, a student in bern started to write a git library for smalltalk. so
there should be already quite some stuff available.
but AFAIK there is no MC adapter yet.
personally I would really appreciate that (also for other versioning tools).
- I like to choose my own tools
- I don't
El lun, 21-02-2011 a las 10:28 -0800, Steven Baker escribió:
> FWIW, Git is a very generic system. There's no reason we couldn't
> write a storage adapter for MC that puts the repo in Git. Git only
> knows about objects, and the versions thereof. We could easily have
> Monticello on top of git.
>
FWIW, Git is a very generic system. There's no reason we couldn't
write a storage adapter for MC that puts the repo in Git. Git only
knows about objects, and the versions thereof. We could easily have
Monticello on top of git.
I'm not sure I think it's a good solution, but it sounds like
something
Hi Esteban,
I look forward to testing it :)
BTW, SqueakSource is not the problem for me (we have a HTTP repository). The MC
speed is what bothers us most... I just responded in this thread since the idea
was mentioned by Camillo. I know that other people are more attached to the
"Smalltalk way
Hi,
I'm already working in a file based solution... it will be ready for test next
one or two months :)
There are some advantages I want to point:
- Better for newcomers
- Better for customers who "want to see the sources" (yes, I have some of them,
time to time)
- We don't need to take care a
I don't know if we have to change to another kind of service. But we MUST
have alternatives.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> Come on. We are talking about quality of service here, or about
> changing the service?
> I don't think that after migrating to (put your favorite
Come on. We are talking about quality of service here, or about
changing the service?
I don't think that after migrating to (put your favorite here), we
won't have any new problems. And then same, lack of people who can
address them.
On 21 February 2011 17:39, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
>
> On Feb 21
>> how about a file based system and git?
-1.
> yea, just discussed this very idea an hour ago...
>
> The simplest thing that could work:
> - Write out changes to files (for each method and class)
> - Use git to commit, push, pull, merge, etc.
> - After git actions, load changed files and compile
On Feb 21, 2011, at 17:22 , Camillo Bruni wrote:
> how about a file based system and git?
yea, just discussed this very idea an hour ago...
The simplest thing that could work:
- Write out changes to files (for each method and class)
- Use git to commit, push, pull, merge, etc.
- After git actio
how about a file based system and git?
On 2011-02-21, at 16:48, Fabrizio Perin wrote:
> Well more or less every 10 days i need to restart it. This discussion happen
> already in different threads but again the problems are:
> 1- The machine hosting squeaksource is an old mac. Maybe on a new machi
Well more or less every 10 days i need to restart it. This discussion happen
already in different threads but again the problems are:
1- The machine hosting squeaksource is an old mac. Maybe on a new machine
running linux it could be better.
2- SqueakSource is running in a squeakimage on a SqueakVM
Thanks,
do nothing, just wait and see until SqueakSource turns completely unusable.
I don't know if people won't noticed or don't want to admit it, but
SqueakSource is down very often lately..
2011/2/21 Fabrizio Perin :
> SqueakSource is up and running. I did restart it at 15:55 GTM+1 so i don't
SqueakSource is up and running. I did restart it at 15:55 GTM+1 so i don't
know how i can help you.
2011/2/21 Hernán Morales Durand
> SqueakSource is down again. I'm tired of this situation, there is any
> alternative "free" repository?
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Hernán Morales
> Information Technology
I mean repository *server*,
Thanks
2011/2/21 Henrik Johansen :
> + Repository
> directory
>
> Cheers,
> Henry
>
> On Feb 21, 2011, at 4:02 46PM, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
>
>> SqueakSource is down again. I'm tired of this situation, there is any
>> alternative "free" repository?
>> Cheers,
>>
>
An FTP repo is a good alternative for private projects. Esteban uses that I
think.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Henrik Johansen <
henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no> wrote:
> + Repository
> directory
>
> Cheers,
> Henry
>
> On Feb 21, 2011, at 4:02 46PM, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
>
> > SqueakS
+ Repository
directory
Cheers,
Henry
On Feb 21, 2011, at 4:02 46PM, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
> SqueakSource is down again. I'm tired of this situation, there is any
> alternative "free" repository?
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Hernán Morales
> Information Technology Manager,
> Institute of Veterinar
31 matches
Mail list logo
