[Pharo-users] Pharo days: date proposal

2014-10-02 Thread stepharo
Hi pharoers and others happy hackers we would like to organize PharoDays a two days gathering mix between a conference and a huge sprint. We thought that the 29 and 30 of January 2015 is a good date. Now before launching the organization process we would like to know if there is not a huge

Re: [Pharo-users] BLOG: Block Translators - parsing magic

2014-10-02 Thread Damien Cassou
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Udo Schneider udo.schnei...@homeaddress.de wrote: I'll check the project structure and tell you. But I assume I'd prefer working directly - even if in my directory only. you should have received an invitation -- Damien Cassou

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo days: date proposal

2014-10-02 Thread Stephan Eggermont
That combines well with FOSDEM, which is the next two days in Bruxelles. Yesterday I got a mail that we'll be having a smalltalk room on Sunday. Stephan

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo days: date proposal

2014-10-02 Thread Marcus Denker
On 02 Oct 2014, at 18:30, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote: That combines well with FOSDEM, which is the next two days in Bruxelles. Yesterday I got a mail that we'll be having a smalltalk room on Sunday. That is nice! Marcus signature.asc Description: Message signed with

Re: [Pharo-users] Parsing SQL in a Pharo system

2014-10-02 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Esteban wrote: Are you using/planning to use PostgresV3? What are its advantages over current driver (PostgresV2)? I was puzzled that a smart developer like Levente decides not to use Glorp. And I wondered why SqueakDBX decided to use V2 instead of V3, a protocol introduced in 2003 or so.

Re: [Pharo-users] BLOG: Block Translators - parsing magic

2014-10-02 Thread Udo Schneider
On 02.10.14 18:17, Damien Cassou wrote: you should have received an invitation Yepp - I did. Already committed the Blog entry 1:1. Working on cleaning up the language now. BTW: Is there any guide regarding the kind of language (e.g. tonality) of the book. I'd change the it given the fact

Re: [Pharo-users] Parsing SQL in a Pharo system

2014-10-02 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
2014-10-02 15:19 GMT-03:00 Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl: Esteban wrote: Are you using/planning to use PostgresV3? What are its advantages over current driver (PostgresV2)? I was puzzled that a smart developer like Levente decides not to use Glorp. I don't want to sound harsh, but there

[Pharo-users] Conceptually the same as in Smalltalk

2014-10-02 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
I've read that #= can ignore non-domain things like cache data, but what about domain-related things that do not effect identity? Let's say I have a Person class. Obviously, the #name would be compared in #=. But what if there was a collection of #phoneNumbers, and aPerson and anotherPerson

Re: [Pharo-users] Parsing SQL in a Pharo system

2014-10-02 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Esteban, On 02 Oct 2014, at 20:43, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-10-02 15:19 GMT-03:00 Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl: Esteban wrote: Are you using/planning to use PostgresV3? What are its advantages over current driver (PostgresV2)? I was puzzled that a

Re: [Pharo-users] Parsing SQL in a Pharo system

2014-10-02 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
HI, Well, what you say sounds harsh... but is not too far from truth, sadly. What happens is that current manpower for every task is very limited (it's me)... and well, urgent stuff is always hunting us. We have the willing, and we have spent some time on it, but it will be a lot easier if there

Re: [Pharo-users] Conceptually the same as in Smalltalk

2014-10-02 Thread Alexandre Bergel
Hi Sean, This is a complex question. Essentially, this is the difference between a plain normal class and an abstract data type. Abstract data type will typically override hash and = to give the ability to structurally compare them. From my rather long experience in programming, I do not

Re: [Pharo-users] Parsing SQL in a Pharo system

2014-10-02 Thread stepharo
On 2/10/14 20:43, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote: I don't want to sound harsh, but there is no VISIBLE interest from the Pharo board/committee regarding ORM and/or RDBMS support other than a CI task. Do you really mean that the board is a kind of jerks and idiots that are lazy bastards? If

Re: [Pharo-users] Parsing SQL in a Pharo system

2014-10-02 Thread stepharo
On 2/10/14 23:37, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: HI, Well, what you say sounds harsh... but is not too far from truth, sadly. What happens is that current manpower for every task is very limited (it's me)... and well, urgent stuff is always hunting us. But esteban this is not true. Pharo is not