On 13 Feb 2015, at 04:46, Sebastian Heidbrink shei...@yahoo.de wrote:
Ha!
Now I think I got it!
Spec is MVVM and not MVC!
Something like that ;-)
That means if I would like to implement with Spec, my root of entry should be
a subclass of Model (ViewModel in real).
If I would like
On 11 Feb 2015, at 16:07, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-11 10:02 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu:
ps: As said in another thread, Torsten's version (descendant of mine)
didn't seem to have this issue.
Yes, we are making (some) progress.
Maybe we
Hi,
From now on it is forbidden to complain about Spec in general, unspecific terms
unless you have taken the time to learn about it. Here is a guide to
documentation about Spec, most recent first.
There is an excellent presentation by Johan Fabry did during the last Pharo
Days, 'Using Spec
El Wed Feb 11 2015 at 4:08:36 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com
escribió:
2015-02-11 10:02 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu:
ps: As said in another thread, Torsten's version (descendant of mine)
didn't seem to have this issue.
Yes, we are making (some) progress.
In order to not get results like
the extent and width should be calculated values.
That would change the example code to something like
LoginModel classdefaultSpec
spec: #default
^SpecLayout composed
newColumn: [ :col |
col
newRow: [ :row |
Excerpts from Martin Bähr's message of 2015-02-03 06:48:19 +0100:
you can read more about the workshop and find the screencast here:
http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/training/Using-the-FileSystem-class-in-Pharo-Smalltalk
part two is here:
Hi Stephan,
You are 100% right: I had similar code in there during my hacking but I decided
to take it out to simplify things. A couple of important semantic constants are
indeed missing. But it is not just that, IMHO, the LoginModel should say 'I am
2 fields heigh', the wrapping in the Dialog
(it probably helps to include a link :-)
Excerpts from Martin Bähr's message of 2015-02-03 06:48:19 +0100:
you can read more about the workshop and find the screencast here:
http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/training/Using-the-FileSystem-class-in-Pharo-Smalltalk
part two is here:
To see a working example of this, take a look at StoryBoard
Download the 30 image from
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/StoryBoard/
Start it, open the seaside control panel and start a ZnZincServerAdaptor on port
8080. Open a web browser on http://localhost:8080/story, register
Two more:
'Building a Simple Calculator with Spec'
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/view/Books/job/PharoReadyForReviews/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/CalculatorTutorial/CalculatorTutorial.pier.html
'Dynamic Spec: Parties, a dynamic example'
Hi Cam
Interesting. The brain-dead-sample is a bit difficult to get started with.
Would you care to talk a bit more about how to do something simple with it?
An addressbook, with people having addresses and phone numbers
might be an easy to use example.
Cheers,
Stephan
What should be done to make this work on OS X?
UnQLiteFFIlibraryFileNameForPlatform
has a wrong name, but that doesn't help me.
Even after renaming the library cannot be found.
Stephan
Excellent mails, Sven. Thanks a lot for joining all the info in one place!
On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:12, Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu wrote:
Hi,
From now on it is forbidden to complain about Spec in general, unspecific
terms unless you have taken the time to learn about it. Here is
hi,
i just discovered that i can't make https requests in pharo because pharo-vm
tries to link against libssl.1.0.0, but recent fedora versions have
libssl.so.1.0.1e at least since fedora 18
i did discover that the centos version on
http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo/linux/centos/
works however.
i
On 13 Feb 2015, at 18:47, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 Feb 2015, at 18:29, Johan Fabry jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl wrote:
If we think about renaming things in Spec, actually I’d rename:
- ComposableModel to ComposableUI
- all the protocols ‘protocol-*’ to ‘API-*’
On 13 Feb 2015, at 18:29, Johan Fabry jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl wrote:
If we think about renaming things in Spec, actually I’d rename:
- ComposableModel to ComposableUI
- all the protocols ‘protocol-*’ to ‘API-*’
+100
I’m super tired of “protocol” category (it is actually a protocol… as any
Hallo Sven,
thank you for the video link, google linked me to a video from 2013 that
was not recorded in a way that once could follwo the presentation.
This one is super.
Well, I think I am slowly getting there and I can more and more provide
you with the uneccessary barries of Spec that I
If we think about renaming things in Spec, actually I’d rename:
- ComposableModel to ComposableUI
- all the protocols ‘protocol-*’ to ‘API-*'
On Feb 13, 2015, at 14:58, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
So should we really rename ComposableModel to ComposableUIModel ? (And
before
By the way, this is why I am pushing so hard.
https://makerspacenanaimo.org/software-smalltalk-night/
Sebastian
Am 13.02.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Sebastian Heidbrink:
Hallo Sven,
thank you for the video link, google linked me to a video from 2013
that was not recorded in a way that once
On 13 Feb 2015, at 19:06, Sebastian Heidbrink shei...@yahoo.de wrote:
By the way, this is why I am pushing so hard.
https://makerspacenanaimo.org/software-smalltalk-night/
Sebastian
Cool.
Am 13.02.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Sebastian Heidbrink:
Hallo Sven,
thank you for the video
On 13 Feb 2015, at 18:49, Sebastian Heidbrink shei...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hallo Sven,
thank you for the video link, google linked me to a video from 2013 that was
not recorded in a way that once could follwo the presentation.
This one is super.
Well, I think I am slowly getting there and
Hi Sven,
I am still a little confused about the terminologies so please give one
last kick into the right direction.
I have loaded the Calculator and try to map thingssaid to the
implementation.
Am 13.02.2015 um 11:04 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe:
In the talk at 15:35 min Johan mentions
---BeginMessage---
Stephan,
First let me say, if i can figure out the proper markdown to get
color-coded inset-code looking right, i would gladly improve the DebrisDB
description with more simple examples. Additionally, i am happy to answer
questions in email. I will also consider a few video
---BeginMessage---
i'll be glad too. Let me check in an update with such an example.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl
wrote:
Hi Cam
Interesting. The brain-dead-sample is a bit difficult to get started with.
Would you care to talk a bit more about how to do
---BeginMessage---
One note about the tests of *FaDemoContactsTests*: previously i thought
the tests of TestCase were run in alphabetical order. So three of tests may
fail if they run before #test1AddingItemsToDB has run. On subsequent runs,
the tests should all go green.
-cam
On Fri, Feb 13,
Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
Spec is not perfect, its main 'issue' is that the UI elements are called
models
I appreciate the ability to easily create standard vanilla business UIs...
which we did not have in the not-too-distant-past. And I'm not too worried
because everything's a work in
Hi all,
What method do you use to organize/tag your packages so you can then easily
retrieve those sharing a same tag? Is there any functionality intended for
it?
I've been trying the following ones (ordered by increasing satisfaction):
prefixing, flagging, sharing repository, pragma. But i feel
As I say in my talk, there are a bunch of completely working examples already
in the image. Please have a look at the subclasses of ComposableModel I think
that there should be enough examples there to help you understand how a full
application is built.
On Feb 13, 2015, at 18:49, Sebastian
Thank for clarifiying this.
The the interpreter would be the arrow from the ViewModel
(ComposableModel) to the Model...
So Spec is the Blue stuff and the HP35 example is including the orange part.
Is there already a framework available or somebody working on it to have
a more detailed
On Feb 13, 2015, at 19:44, Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu wrote:
On 13 Feb 2015, at 18:47, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 Feb 2015, at 18:29, Johan Fabry jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl wrote:
If we think about renaming things in Spec, actually I’d rename:
-
To clarify: in my talk when I mention the interpreter, this has nothing to do
with Spec. This is something specific to the example (= a complete IDE for a
programming language for robots … with its interpreter), so I did not want to
talk about because in the end it has no relevance to the
What is wrong with this spec?
Why is the checkbox attached to the buttom? I would have expected it to be
directly underneath the password label.
Is this default behavior and how can I prevent this?
defaultSpec
spec: #default
^SpecLayout composed
newColumn: [ :col |
col
Ok, forget it, i've just noticed Groups...
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Laura Risani laura.ris...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
What method do you use to organize/tag your packages so you can then
easily retrieve those sharing a same tag? Is there any functionality
intended for it?
I've
Hi,
There was a mistake in the algorithm as the matching was case sensitive
which is not useful in our case. So, try this:
spotterSelectorsFor: aStep
(...)
Works perfect.
So additions i would like to see built by default
Cmd+w to close on GTSpotter and GTPlayground.
This works. Could
34 matches
Mail list logo