hi,
> On 30 May 2018, at 01:59, Andrei Stebakov wrote:
>
> On Pharo 7.0, Windows 10 when I try to clone from pillar-markup/pillar on
> Windows 10, it gives me an error "the filename or extension is too long”
this is more a problem of pillar being in filetree format than iceberg.
there is no
While protoyping in a "live" system like Pharo, you often may add a new
instance variable to existing object,
the value of which is "nil" and may break the associated behaviour you next
add.
To deal with that you either have to sprinkle ifNils: around your code,
or alternatively do it in one
On Pharo 7.0, Windows 10 when I try to clone from pillar-markup/pillar on
Windows 10, it gives me an error "the filename or extension is too long"
Also I got a couple of questions:
- How do I check the version of Iceberg
- How can I update from Iceberg 0.7.1 on Pharo 6.1 (installed using
Is there support for HTTPS on Windows (or any plans to get it to work)?
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:30 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Time for a new Iceberg update, that will be available in the next Pharo
> build. This time, there are lots of cleanups and enhancements. On the big
>
Call for Papers:
11th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering
(SLE 2018)
co-located with SPLASH 2018
November 5-6, 2018
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
On 05/29/2018 08:49 AM, sergio ruiz wrote:
If a model has a list of things.. such as a user that can/may have lots
of pets, are there any real benefits to initializing the list of pets
lazily?
Yes, there's a huge benefit to lazy initialization; it's more resilient
to class changes in the
This makes sense.. in the the cases i am writing now, all objects will, by
definition, have a bunch objects in the collection..
Thanks!
On May 29, 2018 at 12:02:53 PM, Norbert Hartl (norb...@hartl.name) wrote:
Lazy initialization is good if you only want to assign additional objects when
> Am 29.05.2018 um 17:49 schrieb sergio ruiz :
>
> If a model has a list of things.. such as a user that can/may have lots of
> pets, are there any real benefits to initializing the list of pets lazily?
>
> like:
>
> self pets := OrderedCollection new.
>
> vs.
>
> pets
> pets ifNil: [self
If a model has a list of things.. such as a user that can/may have lots of
pets, are there any real benefits to initializing the list of pets lazily?
like:
self pets := OrderedCollection new.
vs.
pets
pets ifNil: [self pets: OrderedCollection new]
^ pets
thanks!
peace,
sergio
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 4:15 PM Steffen Märcker wrote:
> Dear Serge,
>
> on the VM mailing list, Levente pointed out, that this could also be
> related to some lib the VM uses (e.g., Freetype) that might change the
> rounding mode. I'll dig into it and give your idea a try and come back
> with
Dear Serge,
on the VM mailing list, Levente pointed out, that this could also be
related to some lib the VM uses (e.g., Freetype) that might change the
rounding mode. I'll dig into it and give your idea a try and come back
with the results.
I think it would be nice to have in Pharo 7.
Hi Francisco,
> Le 29 mai 2018 à 00:30, Francisco Lizarralde francisco.lizarralde@
> a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was using the PharoLauncher (32 bits) version on Ubuntu 14.04 (32 bits)
> without problem. But two days ago I installed Ubuntu 18.04 (64 bits) and
> tried to run
Hi all,
Time for a new Iceberg update, that will be available in the next Pharo
build. This time, there are lots of cleanups and enhancements. On the big
highlights:
- Tonel migration plugin is available in the "Other menu item"
- Tests are green on 64 bits! (meaning iceberg can be safely used
Hi Francisco,
> Le 29 mai 2018 à 00:30, Francisco Lizarralde
> a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was using the PharoLauncher (32 bits) version on Ubuntu 14.04 (32 bits)
> without problem. But two days ago I installed Ubuntu 18.04 (64 bits) and
> tried to run PharoLauncher-linux-1.1-x64 and when I
14 matches
Mail list logo
