Hi,
I'm trying to read the contents of a Wikipedia article that was exported
from there using Wikipedias JSON API.
The script I'm trying is:
NeoJSONReader fromString:
'https://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/pharopedia/doc/tip/docs/wikipedia.org/wiki/en/Pharo/contents.json'
asUrl retrieveContents
Same for me!
Phil
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, 17:41 Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas, <
offray.l...@mutabit.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Santiago! You did a pretty good job representing the
> community and is nice to have you also in the community channels.
>
> I will shared on my networks.
>
> Offray
>
>
Thanks a lot Santiago! You did a pretty good job representing the
community and is nice to have you also in the community channels.
I will shared on my networks.
Offray
On 7/02/20 2:50 a. m., Santiago Bragagnolo wrote:
> Fosdem organization uploaded the videos on grafoscopio :).
>
> Maybe it
Hi Esteban,
> No it doesn’t :)
> What you are getting looks like an error that happen when you try to execute
> zeroconf on top of an already existing zeroconf.
Ahhh That explains everything. Here's what happened:
- I tried downloading in a fresh directory
- A second later, I had a power
> The audience for the Smalltalk-inspired campaign is the other 99% of
programmers who would never get past: "Smalltalk = 1980 = dead = not worth
checking out".
Never? This is what I've been trying to overcome for the past 5 years with
hundreds of blogs.
> Have already made up their mind and
Although I'll stick to what I wrote,
looking back at what I wrote, it appears as to be
not friendly at all times, I will try to prevent that next time.
It also has to do with communication in writing only, which
is a whole lot different as talking and listening while e.g.
sharing a table together
Although I'll stick to what I wrote,
looking back at what I wrote, it appears as to be
not friendly at all times, I will try to prevent that next time.
It also has to do with communication in writing only, which
is a whole lot different as talking and listening while e.g.
sharing a table together
This is actually a very good issue you have raised. As far as I am able to
read the code for Dictionary and HashedCollection, the implementation is
not very well suited for deletions at all.
First, as you have discovered, the remove has an implementation which is
unsound (performance wise).
Thanks Peter.
Here some informations about execution time :
dic := Dictionary new: 1.
Time microsecondsToRun:[
1 to: 1 do:[ :i |
dic at: i put: i printString.
].
]. "6000µs"
Time microsecondsToRun:[
1 to: 1 do:[ :i |
Bravo!
Lorenzo
Da: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] Per conto di
p...@highoctane.be
Inviato: giovedì 6 febbraio 2020 19:41
A: Any question about pharo is welcome
Oggetto: Re: [Pharo-users] About "it's not pharo but smalltalk"
This is tiring.
I like
10 matches
Mail list logo
