Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

On 22 mai 2014, at 22:29, Luc Fabresse wrote: > > > > 2014-05-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : > > On 22 mai 2014, at 19:07, Luc Fabresse wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> 2014-05-22 18:06 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : >> >> On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: >> >> > >> >> In general,

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

2014-05-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : > > On 22 mai 2014, at 19:07, Luc Fabresse wrote: > > > > > > 2014-05-22 18:06 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : > >> >> On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: >> >> > >> >> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the >> language come

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

2014-05-22 20:37 GMT+02:00 Esteban A. Maringolo : > 2014-05-22 13:06 GMT-03:00 Camille Teruel : > > > > On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: > > > >> > >>> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the > language comes with > >>> a good proxy model by default. > >> > >> +

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

2014-05-22 13:06 GMT-03:00 Camille Teruel : > > On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: > >> >>> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language >>> comes with >>> a good proxy model by default. >> >> + 1 >> We should do that with Camille. > > Yes. > Now the problem i

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

On 22 mai 2014, at 19:07, Luc Fabresse wrote: > > > > > 2014-05-22 18:06 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : > > On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: > > > > >> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language > >> comes with > >> a good proxy model by default. > >

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

2014-05-22 18:06 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : > > On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: > > > > >> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the > language comes with > >> a good proxy model by default. > > > > + 1 > > We should do that with Camille. > > Yes. > Now the probl

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: > >> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language >> comes with >> a good proxy model by default. > > + 1 > We should do that with Camille. Yes. Now the problem is to agree on what is a "good model". There is many use ca

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

We will discuss. Stef 2014-05-21 8:37 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker >: In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language comes with a good proxy model by default. (this way we would avoid that everyone creates one that is not

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language comes with a good proxy model by default. + 1 We should do that with Camille. (this way we would avoid that everyone creates one that is not completely working)

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

Cool, thanks ! I'll let you know if I run into any trouble on Pharo 3. On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Luc Fabresse wrote: > > > 2014-05-21 8:37 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker : > > In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language >> comes with >> a good proxy model by defaul

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

2014-05-21 8:37 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker : > In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language > comes with > a good proxy model by default. > (this way we would avoid that everyone creates one that is not completely > working) > I completely agree with that. I think that

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language comes with a good proxy model by default. (this way we would avoid that everyone creates one that is not completely working) On 21 May 2014, at 08:31, Luc Fabresse wrote: > Hi François, > > The code is here http://ss3

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

Hi François, The code is here http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Ghost.html/Latest the configuration is working but I do not remember if I tested in Pharo 3 now Cheers, #Luc 2014-05-20 18:15 GMT+02:00 François Stephany : > What is the best way to load Ghost in Pharo 3.0? Is there a configuration > so

[Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

What is the best way to load Ghost in Pharo 3.0? Is there a configuration somewhere? Is anyone using it? Voyage does seem to use the ProtoObject+dnu+becomeForward trick. Is there any reason for that?