On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:47 PM Ben Coman wrote:
>
>
> On 20 June 2018 at 15:38, Guillermo Polito
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> Yes, there you're experiencing the limits of our current process. We were
>> studying the usage of git subtrees/submodules/subrepos but none of them
>> seem a satisfying
On 20 June 2018 at 15:38, Guillermo Polito
wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Yes, there you're experiencing the limits of our current process. We were
> studying the usage of git subtrees/submodules/subrepos but none of them
> seem a satisfying solution for what would give us a smooth contribution
> process.
Hi Tim,
Yes, there you're experiencing the limits of our current process. We were
studying the usage of git subtrees/submodules/subrepos but none of them
seem a satisfying solution for what would give us a smooth contribution
process.
Now, we can enhance a bit the current status by adding
Thinking about this more - why doesn’t Calypso appear in iceberg as a separate
project alongside iceberg and Pharo?
That’s what’s confusing? And how did it get loaded from it’s git project
without it appearing?
Which all makes me think there might need to be an iceberg setting - show/hide
Hi - so in trying to improve the sendersof/implementors of - I thought I had
nailed it (and got working what I had done in Pharo 6 for Pharo 7) - but when I
loaded my commit into a fresh image I realised that none of the (minor) changes
I had made to Calypso had been committed.
This is
