Hello,
On the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell which is a
subclass of TestCase.
So far no problem.
But when you are on the MirrorCell part BlankCell must be a subclass of
Cell.
But then the tests will fail because should: cannot be found.
The manual says nothing about
On 2 avr. 2014, at 13:21, Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl wrote:
Hello,
On the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell which is a subclass
of TestCase.
So far no problem.
But when you are on the MirrorCell part BlankCell must be a subclass of Cell.
But then the tests will fail
2014-04-02 13:21 GMT+02:00 Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl:
Hello,
On the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell which is a
subclass of TestCase.
So far no problem.
No, firstly, all cells are just subclasses of Object (
http://squeak.preeminent.org/tut2007/html/015.html).
And in
Hi,
You probably misunderstood the task.
On the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell which is a
subclass of TestCase.
You had to create the class *BlankCellTestCase* (not BlankCell) which is a
subclass of *TestCase*.
BlankCell and BlankCellTestCase are two different classes.
Camille Teruel schreef op 2-4-2014
13:40:
On 2 avr. 2014, at 13:21, Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl
wrote:
Hello,
On the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell which
is a
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 13:51:
Hi,
You probably misunderstood the task.
On
the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell
which is a
And only on this method the test fail on should:
testCellOnState
| cell |
cell := BlankCell new.
cell should: [ cell isOff ].
cell shouldnt: [ cell isOn ].
Yes it does, inasmuch on the bottom of this page (
http://squeak.preeminent.org/tut2007/html/017.html )
both
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 14:22:
And only on this
method the test fail on should:
testCellOnState
| cell |
cell := BlankCell new.
Does this test fails to assert something or it throws you some error?
2014-04-02 15:27 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl:
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 14:22:
And only on this method the test fail on should:
testCellOnState
| cell |
cell := BlankCell new.
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 14:58:
Does this test fails to assert something or it throws you some error?
Like I said earlier it fails with this message:
MessageNotUnderstood: BlankCell should.
Which I find wierd because I use should: also on the other test methods
off BlankCell and
Could you give me the code of test that fails?
2014-04-02 16:05 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl:
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 14:58:
Does this test fails to assert something or it throws you some error?
Like I said earlier it fails with this message:
MessageNotUnderstood:
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 15:07:
Could you give me the code of test that fails?
I can but I did already.
The code is :
testCellOnState
| cell |
cell := BlankCell new.
cell should: [ cell isOff ].
cell shouldnt: [ cell isOn ].
And this is a code which
The mistake is simple. You have to write as follows (just replace cell for
self in two lines before should and shouldnt):
testCellOnState
| cell |
cell := BlankCell new.
self should: [ cell isOff ].
self shouldnt: [ cell isOn ].
2014-04-02 16:12 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 15:16:
The mistake is simple. You have to write as follows
(just replace cell for self in two lines before should and
shouldnt):
testCellOnState
| cell |
That is really wierd:)
2014-04-02 17:17 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl:
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 15:16:
The mistake is simple. You have to write as follows (just replace cell for
self in two lines before should and shouldnt):
testCellOnState
| cell |
cell
On 2 avr. 2014, at 16:27, Mark Rizun mri...@gmail.com wrote:
That is really wierd:)
2014-04-02 17:17 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl:
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 15:16:
The mistake is simple. You have to write as follows (just replace cell for
self in two lines before
16 matches
Mail list logo
