[Pharo-users] reopen closed issues (4798)

2013-12-06 Thread Nicolai Hess
Hi,

if an issue is closed without any comment, what could be the reason?
(This one https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?4798).

Would someone note if I comment on closed issues or are they filtered out?
Can I /or should I reopen issues if they are reproducable.

regards

Nicolai


Re: [Pharo-users] reopen closed issues (4798)

2013-12-06 Thread Marcus Denker

On 06 Dec 2013, at 13:55, Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de wrote:

 Hi,
 
 if an issue is closed without any comment, what could be the reason?
 (This one https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?4798).
 
 Would someone note if I comment on closed issues or are they filtered out?

To me this one looks like a mistake when importing the issues from the old 
tracker.

Other reasons (but then it is often documented)

- someone tried to reproduce and could not (e.g. misunderstanding)
- the issue was open for a looong time and nobody cared (we do that 
less these days)


 Can I /or should I reopen issues if they are reproducible.
 

Yes!

Marcus




Re: [Pharo-users] reopen closed issues (4798)

2013-12-06 Thread Nicolai Hess
2013/12/6 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr


 On 06 Dec 2013, at 13:55, Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de wrote:

 Hi,

 if an issue is closed without any comment, what could be the reason?
 (This one https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?4798).

 Would someone note if I comment on closed issues or are they filtered out?


 To me this one looks like a mistake when importing the issues from the old
 tracker.

 Other reasons (but then it is often documented)

 - someone tried to reproduce and could not (e.g. misunderstanding)
 - the issue was open for a looong time and nobody cared (we do that less
 these days)


 Can I /or should I reopen issues if they are reproducible.



 Yes!

 Marcus




Oh well, it turns out this issue isn't the same I had. And it seems this
issue (4798)
is fixed or not reproducable.

I'll open a new one.


Re: [Pharo-users] reopen closed issues (4798)

2013-12-06 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Thanks nicolai
We just received your license agreement :) tx again.

Stef


On Dec 6, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de wrote:

 2013/12/6 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr
 
 On 06 Dec 2013, at 13:55, Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 if an issue is closed without any comment, what could be the reason?
 (This one https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?4798).
 
 Would someone note if I comment on closed issues or are they filtered out?
 
 To me this one looks like a mistake when importing the issues from the old 
 tracker.
 
 Other reasons (but then it is often documented)
 
   - someone tried to reproduce and could not (e.g. misunderstanding)
   - the issue was open for a looong time and nobody cared (we do that 
 less these days)
 
 
 Can I /or should I reopen issues if they are reproducible.
 
 
 Yes!
 
   Marcus
 
 
 
 
 Oh well, it turns out this issue isn't the same I had. And it seems this 
 issue (4798) 
 is fixed or not reproducable.
 
 I'll open a new one.