Re: [Pharo-users] Discussions on method categories (Was: Moving/rolling average implementations ?)

2020-04-13 Thread Cédrick Béler
(this is not really noise, at least useful one ie. an information like the +1 :) ) At least, I think we need « standard » protocols list, at least for the most used ones. Some conventions too. For instance, all the initialize* (+ class side)… I can cope with that but this is clearly a brain

Re: [Pharo-users] Discussions on method categories (Was: Moving/rolling average implementations ?)

2020-04-13 Thread Guillermo Polito
> El 13 abr 2020, a las 11:17, Cédrick Béler escribió: > > >> Used consistently and well, method categories are not only a >> navigation aid, helping you to find methods you do not know the names >> of, but a helpful documentation aid. For example, #runningMeans: is >> in the 'summarising'

[Pharo-users] Discussions on method categories (Was: Moving/rolling average implementations ?)

2020-04-13 Thread Cédrick Béler
> Used consistently and well, method categories are not only a > navigation aid, helping you to find methods you do not know the names > of, but a helpful documentation aid. For example, #runningMeans: is > in the 'summarising' category. In my Smalltalk, that means > - it inspects every