Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

Le 31/03/2017 à 21:46, Stephane Ducasse a écrit : Hi thierry Where can I find a documentation of +, * ? in the grammar (and especially how to manage the production)? formally, +, *, ? do behave as they are defined in BNF extensions. They are compiled by generating itermediate productions, as

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

Hi thierry Where can I find a documentation of +, * ? in the grammar (and especially how to manage the production)? And indeed they do not work in the Moose version. I think that if +, *, ?, ( ) are working in the grammar it is an important addition to Smacc. Because I found it right now verbose

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

Hi, It is actually the economic reasoning that prevailed here. John was willing to invest effort to both work with and benefit from the Moose/GT environment. The consequence was that he built the GT extensions for SmaCC while Andrei and I offered a bit of support. In this process, we also got

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

Hi Jimmie, Le 29/03/2017 à 20:07, Jimmie Houchin a écrit : What I don't understand from this thread, and my apologies if it was expressed. But to me the question is not what or why happened in the past. Rather what is the way to proceed ahead with a single canonical source. This is what will

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

What I don't understand from this thread, and my apologies if it was expressed. But to me the question is not what or why happened in the past. Rather what is the way to proceed ahead with a single canonical source. This is what will benefit the community. What and where is that source.

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

2017-03-29 18:07 GMT+02:00 Stephane Ducasse : > Ok I should say that I do not understand the differences and why there are > two versions of Smacc. > So I will stop maintaining the tutorial because now may be I should revert > what I wrote. > I was too stupid to do it in

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

2017-03-29 18:21 GMT+02:00 Stephane Ducasse : > So I browsed the mailing-list and I foind the mail of thierry saying that > there is no difference. > I will try to tools in moose then. > Probably: the +, *, ?, ( ) in the grammar don't work anymore. As I told you: very

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

So I browsed the mailing-list and I foind the mail of thierry saying that there is no difference. I will try to tools in moose then. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > Ok I should say that I do not understand the differences and why there are >

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

Ok I should say that I do not understand the differences and why there are two versions of Smacc. So I will stop maintaining the tutorial because now may be I should revert what I wrote. I was too stupid to do it in fact I should focus on my stuff and nothing else. This saddens me a lot. We are a

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

Hi, > On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Stephane Ducasse > wrote: > > OK > I loaded Smacc from github as mentioned by thierry. > > Metacello new > baseline: 'SmaCC'; > repository: 'github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC'; > load > > Are there two

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

Le 28/03/2017 à 11:50, Stephane Ducasse a écrit : OK I loaded Smacc from github as mentioned by thierry. Metacello new baseline: 'SmaCC'; repository: 'github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC'; load Are there two configurationOfSmacc? May be we should only have one no? I have

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

OK I loaded Smacc from github as mentioned by thierry. Metacello new baseline: 'SmaCC'; repository: 'github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC'; load Are there two configurationOfSmacc? May be we should only have one no? I have the impression that even thierry and jason working

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

They come with the ConfigurationOfSmaCC which is already in the Moose image. Doru > On Mar 27, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > > Hi > > where can I load the Smacc gt extension and debugger extensions? > > Stef -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com

[Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

Hi where can I load the Smacc gt extension and debugger extensions? Stef