Bruno,
There was the MockGemstone package that created "compatible" reduced
conflict classes (that provide name compatibility but no RC behavior) and
other Gemstone globals (such as System) that you can use.
The develop in Pharo deploy in Gemstone is used by a few projects that I'm
aware of.
As
Hi,
/"There was a gemstone workflow engine - it’s not ported, it looked
interesting but used a Windows bpml tool and again wasn’t sure if it
wanted to own the world, and porting it would be more than I wanted to do." /I think you are talking about BpmFlow (https://github.com/brunobuzzi/BpmFlow)
Please see also http://www.workflowpatterns.com/.
Historically, BPMN by itself was regarded difficult to automate. BPEL as a
workflow language (Oracle SOA, Microsoft BizTalk server) can be interpreted
easily by machine, but it is not so easy to learn by the people who have to
model the process.
On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 at 11:01, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
> Christopher Fuhrman
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 04:27, Tim Mackinnon
> > wrote:
> >> Anyone have any thoughts or directions to explore?
>
> > My intuition says that most software projects don't last long enough to
> > invest in a
> Anyone have any thoughts or directions to explore?
The main assumption about workflows is that they are easily understood by
non-developers, and that non-developers can be involved in the development,
within business environments. However, the workflows per-se were not
accepted well. For
Christopher Fuhrman
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 04:27, Tim Mackinnon
> wrote:
>> Anyone have any thoughts or directions to explore?
> My intuition says that most software projects don't last long enough to
> invest in a general solution to supporting workflows.
So, is there a causal
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 04:27, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
>
> Anyone have any thoughts or directions to explore?
>
My contribution is very academic, and not really my field of expertise (we
evaluated a BPML/BPMN tool about 10 years ago which I think is dead now).
The conference paper from 2016 at
> Am 27.09.2019 um 10:10 schrieb Tim Mackinnon :
>
> If this does become of interest to anyone, I had a quick look at the workflow
> landscape in Pharo and found it rather unfathomable - Netsyle seems very
> comprehensive but complicated and lacking syntactic sugar to make it easy to
> just
If this does become of interest to anyone, I had a quick look at the workflow
landscape in Pharo and found it rather unfathomable - Netsyle seems very
comprehensive but complicated and lacking syntactic sugar to make it easy to
just pick up and run with. It’s reified up the hilt, so simple
Hi everyone, in my day job I encountered an interesting domain problem that a
previous java team has made a bit of a hash of ...
I thought it might be interesting to model it in Pharo to help explain it
better to a new team and I was interested in community thoughts as we have
some of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
