Richard Sargent writes:
> I understand your desire to utilize the existing Smalltalk mechanisms. But,
> I think the most important thing is modelling consistency.
>
> What are the behaviours you expect from Expression, SumExpression, and
> ProductExpression? Do they know their parent expression?
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback!
I am happy you like the new possibilities and that you see the incentives to
move to the new world :).
The inspector part is working quite well. The main reason we call it an alpha
is because of the missing pieces to get to a full environment.
You noticed the
Hi,
The visualization you describe should be easily doable in the new world.
Did you write the visualization in plain Roassal or with the RTMondrian API?
Cheers,
Doru
> On Dec 28, 2018, at 11:32 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote:
>
> Thanks for the explanations!
>
> I like the separation between
> On Dec 28, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Kjell Godo wrote:
>
> WOW
:)
What part of it do you like?
Cheers,
Doru
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:57 Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> I am happy this looks exciting :).
>
> About the confusion part: The Glamorous Toolkit we are working on right now
>
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 at 16:30, Konrad Hinsen
wrote:
> Richard Sargent writes:
>
> > I understand your desire to utilize the existing Smalltalk mechanisms.
> But,
> > I think the most important thing is modelling consistency.
> >
> > What are the behaviours you expect from Expression,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 5:43 PM Konrad Hinsen
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am confronted with an implementation choice that I expect to be not so
> rare, and I wonder what "the Pharo way" is for dealing with it. I will
> use a toy example for illustration, my real case is more complex but not
>
I was going to chip in that every class inherits what compiler it uses and so
you can easily override that to do something special (like wrapping classes).
However, is this possibly an area where the meta-links kicks in so you don’t
have to do this and get a more generic solution? (I haven’t
On 28/12/18 8:03, Tudor Girba wrote:
>> On Dec 28, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Kjell Godo wrote:
>>
>> WOW
> :)
>
> What part of it do you like?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
And which parts you don't?
I wrote a long mail regarding good and no so good parts of the new GT
experience, including features possible
--- Begin Message ---
Did you already try to measure the impaired overhead of a wrapper
solution? It might very well be negligible in an otherwise purely symbolic
computation.
A hybrid solution might be - instead of wrapping each value - to add a
single method to the value classes that
On 12/27/18 9:00 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Hi Jimmie,
On 27 Dec 2018, at 15:15, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
Hello,
I am wanting to subscribe to a perpetual stream of JSON data in my app. I have
failed to find an example which helps me understand how to do so. It may
be there but I
10 matches
Mail list logo
