[Pharo-users] Smalltalk Argument

Dear all, after using Smalltalk for several years I developed a passion for the language (how not to?), and Pharo is just so great to develop with. So thank you guys for keeping this wonderful project running. Unfortunately, it is not easy to always point out why Smalltalk should be employed as

Re: [Pharo-users] LGit_GIT_ERROR: Invalid version 0 on git_remote_callbacks on latest 64bit 6.1 image?

You need to configure Iceberg with the path of the SSH key files you are using to authenticate with gitlab as well as the passphrase to unlock the private key, I only got it working after that. Have your done that? There is more information in the README/FAQ here:

Re: [Pharo-users] Exchanging information between 2 pharo applications (2 images running on two different computers)

Dear all, I would like to give ZeroMQ a try in Smalltalk, but am unable to load it on a new image successfully. In Pharo 5, I loaded the package ConfigurationOfZeroMQ from therepository in smalltalkhub and evaluated the following to load the code:

[Pharo-users] Return value of a FFI call to a external function is its 2`s complement

Dear uFFI experts, I am dealing with the port of the ZeroMQ code to Pharo 6 and found something unexpected to me, at least: Zmq4Api>>apiZmqMsgRecv: message socket: socket withFlags: flags     ^ self ffiCall: #(long zmq_msg_recv (ZmqApiMessage*

Re: [Pharo-users] Return value of a FFI call to a external function is its 2`s complement

Oct 18 17:10:31 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux On 10/30/2017 01:02 PM, Paulo R. Dellani wrote: > Dear uFFI experts, > > I am dealing with the port of the ZeroMQ > <http://smalltalkhub.com/#%21/%7Epanuw/zeromq> code to Pharo 6 and found > something unexpected to me,

Re: [Pharo-users] Return value of a FFI call to a external function is its 2`s complement

emory and the range.  > > Bare in mind that C is a high level language (and not low level as > many incorrect assume) and deal with types that is NOT a low level > concept (excepts types that have to do only with the size/ amount of > bits) . So the type gives crucial information to C how

Re: [Pharo-users] Return value of a FFI call to a external function is its 2`s complement

Hi Pablo, correcting the type declaration in the ffiCall solved the problem, thanks! Cheers, Paulo On 10/30/2017 05:24 PM, teso...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi,  >  the problem is that the Zq function has the following signature: > > int zmq_msg_recv (zmq_msg_t *msg, void *socket, int flags); > > And

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalk Argument

I like your depiction of the situation and arguments, Andrew. The inherent volatility of the software industry due to its tendency to self disruption, as you pointed out, is fertile ground to all kinds of crap, but we as developers should keep our eyes wide open and look for the pearls and gems

Re: [Pharo-users] Exchanging information between 2 pharo applications (2 images running on two different computers)

a new Pharo 6 image. The code need more changes to work, however. Lets see how long it takes to get a few ZeroMQ examples running. I will publish my "fork". Cheers, Paulo On 10/29/2017 03:09 PM, Paulo R. Dellani wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to give ZeroMQ a try in

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalk Argument

On 10/20/2017 10:38 AM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > > > 2017-10-20 10:20 GMT+02:00 Marten Feldtmann >: > > I do not want to spoil the party (perhaps I've done this already) > - but > has anyone done a serious inspection of this

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalk Argument

I think you have nailed it, Joachim! The development environment is per se very productive and easy to use and learn but at the moment you need something that isn't present in your code library, things can get very hard. Well, that's not really new and not only a problem that concerns Smalltalk,

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalk Argument

ial here, and surely there is a greater pool of developer candidates to "draw from" than one can initially imagine/see. Cheers, Paulo On 10/20/2017 12:17 AM, Ben Coman wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Paulo R. Dellani <dell...@pobox.com > <mailto:dell...@pobox.co

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalk Argument

This all sounds very interesting. What is the idea? Wrap libkrb5 through UFFI or implement it in Smalltalk? On 10/26/2017 04:38 PM, henry wrote: > A Kerberos effort will have to be a group effort. Sideways to my main > focus and your all’s main focii. > > > - HH > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at