[Pharo-users] Re: String concatenation performance

2024-03-18 Thread Noury Bouraqadi
Thank you Richard for the detailed response. Noury On Mar 18 2024, at 8:06 am, Richard O'Keefe wrote: > Let me start by giving some figures from my Smalltalk, on an Intel > core I5-6200U @ 2.3 Ghz CPU laptop with 8GB of memory running Ubuntu > 22.04 and gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0.

[Pharo-users] Re: String concatenation performance

2024-03-18 Thread Richard O'Keefe
Let me start by giving some figures from my Smalltalk, on an Intel core I5-6200U @ 2.3 Ghz CPU laptop with 8GB of memory running Ubuntu 22.04 and gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0. Smalltalk is compiled to C then finished with the system C compiler. Static whole-program compilation is

[Pharo-users] Re: String concatenation performance

2024-03-15 Thread Yanni Chiu
The test is using string literals, which may be optimized in various ways. Is that representative of your use case? On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 3:12 PM Noury Bouraqadi wrote: > I thought streamContents: was faster than using a comma binary message... > > I was wrong. Pharo is not Java :-) > > Noury