Re: [phishing] Crisis in Hong Kong (rock phish on .hk)

I sent a nice email friday to them and got the exact same form letter. By sunday morning they were no longer responding at all. Tom At 7:21 PM -0500 3/18/07, Gadi Evron wrote: >I realize .hk is a problem, but a few suggestions: >1. Can we have a third party rather than CastleCops try to contactt

Re: [phishing] Crisis in Hong Kong (rock phish on .hk)

At 7:21 PM -0500 3/18/07, Gadi Evron wrote: >I realize .hk is a problem, but a few suggestions: >1. Can we have a third party rather than CastleCops try to contactthem and >see if they are willing to cooprate? Just got another form letter this AM. >2. Is the .hk situation worse than .info or .biz

Re: [phishing] Crisis in Hong Kong (rock phish on .hk)

* Steve Pirk: > What about contacting someone a ICANN? I know it sounds dumb, > but someone had to grant HKDNR permission to be a .hk registrar. I think .hk is too old a ccTLD that ICANN has any control over it. ___ phishing mailing list phishing@whites

[phishing] Tyndall FCU phish

Link in email is to http://0xda.0x67.0x7c.0xd5/.cgi-bin/.tyndallfcu.org/index.html which seems to be http://218.103.124.213/.cgi-bin/.tyndallfcu.org/index.html ___ phishing mailing list phishing@whitestar.linuxbox.org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.or