I have two early Automatics that are not stamped as 'reproducer.' They look
just like standard speakers from the top, but obviously the weight is
different.
Best regards.
Rene Rondeau
In a message dated 7/19/2008 3:35:52 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ClockworkHome at aol.com writes:
hi all
i found also real clock oil is expensive
i am a clock collector also and have some that i got years ago
best
zono
In a message dated 7/19/2008 4:10:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
rich-mail at octoxol.com writes:
Steve,
Sewing machine oil is the bad one. Clock oil has RO inhibitors
Any one want to bet that ist not a Vic but a Crapophone 12 x 12 x 7, and
that the seller is an English major?
BTW ..If there was an award for the worst eBay listing...
try
120284037333http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=120284037333
(surprisingly
the same seller)
Title: Edison
FYI:
I have an Automatic (# 38030) and a Standard Speaker (#31306) and they
both have no wording on the arms. The serial number stampings are of a
different style from each other. The Automatic has a smaller and
cleaner numbers. The Standard Speaker has almost an italic style
numbers. The
In a message dated 7/20/2008 12:56:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
TAEdisonJR at aol.com writes:
I have two early Automatics that are not stamped as 'reproducer.' They look
just like standard speakers from the top, but obviously the weight is
different.
I think this is
I'm restoring a Columbia type BN outside horn phonograph. This machine has
a one piece aluminum horn and an analyzing reproducer. The arm appears to
have been plated originally. I assumed that I could buff the aluminum to a
nice shine. My problem is that the surface is quite pitted and when
Hello Rene,
If you don't mind what are the serial numbers and do they have the long hinge
pin? The earliest Automatic reproducers have the long hinge pin like the
standard speaker and blank arms were used. 52758 has a blank arm and 54226
says reproducer and 63841 is blank, once again Edison
7 matches
Mail list logo