: rich-m...@octoxol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
The physical surface shrinks. This is why they were recorded at a speed
different than the 160 desired final result. The actual question was how
was the 160 RPM speed checked? And with an accuracy
In a message dated 7/12/2011 3:56:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
esrobe...@hotmail.com writes:
I've never heard of this. Must be a fascinating read. Where did you
hear about cylinders being recorded at a different speed than the intended
playback?
that has to be the
like that. As such, I ain't buyin' it (nothing personal)!
Best,Robert
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:05:02 -0500
From: rich-m...@octoxol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
The physical surface shrinks. This is why they were recorded at a speed
different than
: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
In a message dated 7/12/2011 3:56:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
esrobe...@hotmail.com writes:
I've never heard of this. Must be a fascinating read. Where did you
hear about cylinders being recorded at a different speed than the intended
playback
the recording speed still be
160rpm?
Glenn
From: allena...@aol.com allena...@aol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Tue, July 12, 2011 4:34:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
In a message dated 7/12/2011 3:56:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
esrobe
closer to 97tpi?)
Best, Robert
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:30:21 -0700
From: majesticrec...@snet.net
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
This follows Robert's thoughts as well (I think). This is all about in-plane
shrinkage. So the original cylinder
...@aol.com
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:34:21 -0400
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
In a message dated 7/12/2011 3:56:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
esrobe...@hotmail.com writes:
I've never heard of this. Must be a fascinating read. Where did you
hear about
: Tue, July 12, 2011 4:34:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
In a message dated 7/12/2011 3:56:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
esrobe...@hotmail.com writes:
I've never heard of this. Must be a fascinating read. Where did you
hear about cylinders being recorded at a different
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
This follows Robert's thoughts as well (I think). This is all about
in-plane
shrinkage. So the original cylinder is longer to accommodate this
shrinkage and
the speed at which the cutter would move laterally across
All this talk of shrinkage makes me feel as if I'm in an episode of
Seinfeld ;-) Spring motor, leather belt drive, and questionable
tolerances do not meet the level of laser precision. Get it close,
tune to ear, and enjoy.
Loran
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Rich rich-m...@octoxol.com wrote:
, Robert
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:30:21 -0700
From: majesticrec...@snet.net
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
This follows Robert's thoughts as well (I think). This is all about
in-plane
shrinkage. So the original cylinder is longer to accommodate
I think that was my original point. Shooting a flea with an atomic cannon...
On 07/12/2011 06:49 PM, Loran T. Hughes wrote:
All this talk of shrinkage makes me feel as if I'm in an episode of
Seinfeld ;-) Spring motor, leather belt drive, and questionable
tolerances do not meet the level of
Granted. I was seeking the answer to a different question entirely.
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:00:40 -0500
From: rich-m...@octoxol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
I think that was my original point. Shooting a flea with an atomic cannon
: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
This follows Robert's thoughts as well (I think). This is all about in-plane
shrinkage. So the original cylinder is longer to accommodate this shrinkage and
the speed at which the cutter would move laterally across the cylinder would
have to be slightly
core enough to get
it to fit? $45 seems steep to me for sandpaper glued to a stick, but I've
considered trying one.
Robert
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:24:43 -0500
From: rich-m...@octoxol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
The shrink on a BA can
to a stick, but I've
considered trying one.
Robert
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:24:43 -0500
From: rich-m...@octoxol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
The shrink on a BA can be enough to run out of lateral travel on the
reproducer before you run out
Hi all, quick question after a long absence: if a given point along the
circumference of a cylinder passes a fixed position exactly 160 times per
minute, why would the pitch change? Even if it shrunk to half its size, but was
still played at 160 rpm, the wavelengths of the recorded frequencies
There is both radial and axial shrinkage. Beyond that, how did Edison
Co. determine 160 RPM?
On 07/11/2011 05:20 PM, Robert Wright wrote:
Hi all, quick question after a long absence: if a given point along the
circumference of a cylinder passes a fixed position exactly 160 times per
minute,
of the physical surface, that ain't gonna
happen.
Best, Robert
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:09:08 -0500
From: rich-m...@octoxol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
There is both radial and axial shrinkage. Beyond
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:09:08 -0500
From: rich-m...@octoxol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shrinking cylinder speed?
There is both radial and axial shrinkage. Beyond that, how did Edison
Co. determine 160 RPM?
On 07/11/2011 05:20 PM, Robert Wright wrote:
Hi all, quick
20 matches
Mail list logo
